9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Penalty under section 271(1)(a) of IT Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1973-74
In this case, the appeal was filed by the Department and the cross-objection was filed by the assessee against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1973-74. The main issue revolved around whether the delay in filing the return was justified and whether there was reasonable cause for the delay. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) initiated penalty proceedings against the assessee for filing the return after the due date of 15th August 1973. The assessee claimed that an extension was granted until 31st March 1974, but the ITO found no evidence to support this claim. The ITO also held that the accounts should have been submitted based on unaudited accounts and later revised after audit. Consequently, a penalty of Rs. 18,334 was imposed by the ITO. Upon appeal, the assessee argued that the delay was due to reasons beyond their control and cited a Tribunal decision to support their case. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) reviewed the auditor's certificate, which stated that the audit work was delayed due to reasons beyond their control. The AAC held that the delay until 25th April 1974 was justified, but found fault with the delay in filing the return until 31st May 1974. As a result, the penalty for one month was upheld, and the rest was deleted. The Department appealed the AAC's decision, contending that the entire penalty should have been sustained. On the other hand, the assessee cross-objected, arguing that there was sufficient cause for the delay in filing the return on 31st May 1974. The Tribunal considered the delay caused by the auditors in furnishing the audited accounts as a reasonable cause, thus justifying the delay in filing the return. The Tribunal also found the time taken by the assessee to file the return after receiving the audited report to be reasonable. Consequently, the Tribunal canceled the penalty order imposed by the ITO. In conclusion, the departmental appeal was dismissed, and the cross-objection was allowed in full. The Tribunal held that there was reasonable cause for the delay in filing the return, and therefore, the penalty was canceled in its entirety.
|
