1986 (6) TMI 168 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Bombay in 1986 (6) TMI 168 stated that the application was premature as the duty amount was not quantified, but the penalty amount could be deposited without a stay. Shri V.J. Taraporewala represented the Appellant, and Shri N K. Pattekar represented the Respondent Collector.