Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1987 (8) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1987 (8) TMI 191 - AT - Central Excise
Issues: Classification for Basic Customs Duty on Cartridge Paper
Issue Analysis: The judgment revolves around the classification of Cartridge Paper for Basic Customs Duty purposes. The importer claimed classification under Heading 48.01/21(3) of the Customs Tariff Act, while the Revenue assessed it under sub-heading (1) not elsewhere specified. The Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay accepted the importer's claim for classification under sub-heading (3) based on a government order. The Collector of Customs, Bombay challenged this decision before the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi. The main contention was the interpretation of Government Order No. 839 of 1980, which distinguished Cartridge Paper based on substance weight. The Tribunal analyzed the order and found it related to Central Excise Tariff Item 17(2), not the Customs Tariff. The order did not directly support the classification under the Customs Tariff as claimed by the importer. The Tribunal delved into the characteristics and definitions of Cartridge Paper in various industry publications. It noted that Cartridge Paper is distinct from printing and writing paper, as per industry standards and trade practices. The judgment emphasized the need for harmonious construction in interpreting tariff classifications and highlighted the importance of distinguishing Cartridge Paper from other paper types for proper classification. The Tribunal rejected the importer's argument that all offset printing paper should be classified as printing and writing paper. It emphasized the specific characteristics and uses of Cartridge Paper, as outlined in industry sources and reports. The judgment upheld the classification of the imported products under sub-heading (3) as other printing and writing paper, dismissing the appeals. Additionally, the Tribunal addressed a cross-objection filed by the respondents, treating it as comments on the grounds of appeal. The cross-objection referred to certain decisions but did not impact the Tribunal's decision on the classification issue. Ultimately, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the classification of Cartridge Paper under the relevant sub-heading for Basic Customs Duty purposes.
|