9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of section 5(1)(xiv) of the Gift-tax Act for exemption eligibility based on the circumstances of the case. Analysis: The High Court of Kerala was tasked with deciding whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 5(1)(xiv) of the Gift-tax Act concerning a gift made in the course of carrying on a business, profession, or vocation. The case involved Dr. George Kuruvilla, a practicing doctor, who gifted properties to his son, Thomas Kuruvilla, who had recently joined his father's profession. The key question was whether the gift deed satisfied the requirements of the Act. The court highlighted the two essential criteria for exemption under section 5(1)(xiv): first, that the gift was made in the course of carrying on a business, profession, or vocation, and second, that it was made for the purpose of such business, profession, or vocation. The court noted that Dr. Kuruvilla was actively practicing as a doctor at the time of the gift, meeting the first criterion. The court dismissed the argument that a connected relation was necessary, stating that the principle from a previous Supreme Court decision was not applicable in this context. Regarding the purpose of the gift, the court determined that it could be seen as beneficial for the orderly conduct of the business. The court emphasized that demonstrating commercial expediency and facilitating the business was sufficient, without the need to prove direct profit generation. Citing relevant precedents, the court supported its conclusion by referring to previous decisions that aligned with their interpretation. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the gift met the requirements for exemption under section 5(1)(xiv) of the Gift-tax Act. The judgment would be forwarded to the Appellate Tribunal as required by law, and no costs were awarded for the reference.
|
