9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Validity of import of cloves under Bill of Entry. 2. Publication of Public Notice regarding change in import regulations. 3. Compliance with Customs Act, 1962. Detailed Analysis: 1. The appeal challenged an order by the Additional Collector of Customs regarding the import of 3000 kgs of cloves under a specific Bill of Entry. The issue arose when the goods were alleged to be not covered by Open General License (O.G.L.) at the time of import, leading to a fine of Rs. 50,000 and a penalty under Sec. 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant argued that the Public Notice removing cloves from O.G.L. and placing them under a canalised category was not published in the Gazette and made available for sale before the import date. The appellant contended that without proper notification, the import could not be considered unauthorized or in contravention of the law. 2. The legal representative of the appellant emphasized that the Department failed to produce evidence of the Public Notice publication despite multiple adjournments. Referring to judgments from the Bombay High Court and the Madras High Court, the Tribunal highlighted the necessity for proper publication and availability of notifications to the public for them to become operative. The Tribunal quoted the rulings to emphasize that the mere printing of notifications in the Official Gazette without making them available to the public does not fulfill the legal requirements of notification. Citing a communication from the Department of Publications, the Tribunal found that the Gazette containing the relevant notification was made available for public sale after the import date, supporting the appellant's argument. 3. After considering the submissions and legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the import of cloves could not be deemed in contravention of the law due to the lack of proper notification and availability to the public. Relying on the principles outlined by the High Courts and the Supreme Court regarding the necessity of notification for compliance, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant. The decision was based on the failure of the Department to provide evidence of timely publication and availability of the Public Notice, rendering the import valid in the absence of proper notification.
|
