Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1991 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1991 (2) TMI 246 - AT - Central Excise

Issues: Classification of reclaimed rubber under the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944

Analysis:
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, heard the appeal regarding the classification of reclaimed rubber under the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944. The impugned order by the Collector (Appeals) upheld the classification of the reclaimed rubber under Item No. 68 of the First Schedule to the Act, confirming a duty demand of Rs. 3,42,683.64 for a specific period. The lower authorities based their decision on a previous Tribunal ruling in a similar case. Both parties presented arguments, but the Tribunal found that the matter could be resolved on a concise ground.

In a previous case, the Tribunal had classified reclaimed rubber sheets as raw material for manufacturing rubber sheets, not as a final rubber product. The Tribunal relied on the appellant's submissions that indicated the manufacturing process did not involve producing rubber sheets. However, in the current case, the appellant detailed a manufacturing process that included passing the material through roller sheeting mills to obtain reclaimed rubber sheets. This process differed from the previous case where the appellant did not possess the necessary machinery for sheet production. The appellant consistently stated that the goods were sold only in sheet form, which was not addressed in the Collector (Appeals) order.

The Tribunal concluded that the reclaimed rubber in question was indeed in sheet form, falling under sub-item (2) of Item 16A of the Act. The classification list described the goods as Reclaimed Rubber Sheet/Un-hardened Unvulcanised, which was approved for classification under Item 16A(2) of the Act. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and granting consequential relief to the appellant.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates