Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 1992 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1992 (3) TMI 185 - AT - Customs

Issues: Classification of imported item 'Heating element for Domestic Refrigerators' under Heading 98.06 or Heading 8516.80.

The judgment involves a dispute regarding the classification of an imported item, specifically a 'Heating element for Domestic Refrigerators,' under either Heading 98.06 or Heading 8516.80 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The Collector of Customs (Appeals) had classified the item under Heading 98.06, while the importer contended that it should fall under Heading 8516.80. The key issue is whether the item should be classified as a part of a refrigerator under Heading 98.06 or as an electric heating resistor under Heading 8516.80.

Analysis:

The Collector of Customs (Appeals) had classified the imported item under Heading 98.06 based on Chapter Note 1 to Chapter 98, which covers all parts of goods falling under specific chapters, including Chapters 84 and 85. The Collector held that even though the item was previously classified under Heading 8516.80, the creation of Heading 98.06 encompassed such parts, making the assessment under Heading 98.06 appropriate. The Collector emphasized that Heading 98.06 is not limited to goods specified in Note 7 to Chapter 98 or certain notifications, and thus, the classification under this heading was justified.

The appellant argued that the imported item should be classified under Heading 8516.80, citing Note 2 of Section XVI, which states that parts included in any headings of Chapter 84 or 85 should be classified accordingly. The appellant contended that the item, although designed as a part of a refrigerator, should be specifically classified under Heading 8516.80 as electric heating resistors. Additionally, the appellant relied on the rule that the most specific description should prevail over a more general one, asserting that Heading 8516.80 is the appropriate classification for the item.

The Tribunal considered the contentions of both parties and examined the nature of the imported item. While refrigerators are classified under Heading 84.18 and parts under Heading 8410.69, the Tribunal noted that the item in question, although used as a part of a refrigerator, was specifically designed as a heating element. The Tribunal observed that the item was imported as a part of a refrigerator, despite being described as a 'heating element double insulated P C Cable' on the bill of entry.

The Tribunal analyzed the relevant notes and headings, concluding that the item should be classified under Heading 98.06, which covers parts of machinery and equipment from specific chapters, including Chapters 84 and 85. The Tribunal emphasized that Chapter 98 applies to all goods meeting the prescribed conditions, even if they could be classified under a more specific heading elsewhere in the schedule. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the classification of the imported item under Heading 98.06, rejecting the appellant's arguments based on Note 2 of Section XVI.

In a separate judgment, the Tribunal referred to the case of Voltas Ltd. v. Collector of Customs and highlighted the application of Rule 3 for the interpretation of the Customs Tariff Schedule. The Tribunal emphasized that when goods are prima facie classifiable under multiple headings, the heading providing the most specific description should be preferred. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's contentions and dismissed the appeal based on the principles established in the Voltas case.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the classification of the imported item 'Heating element for Domestic Refrigerators' under Heading 98.06, emphasizing the application of Chapter Note 1 and the specific nature of the item as a part of machinery and equipment from relevant chapters. The judgment highlights the importance of specific descriptions in the classification of goods under the Customs Tariff Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates