1997 (1) TMI 279 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues: Challenge to orders enhancing value of Two-Wheelers and Three-Wheelers, waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944.

In the present case, the applicant contested orders issued by the adjudicating authority and appellate authority, which raised the value of Two-Wheelers and Three-Wheelers manufactured by the appellant and cleared during a specific period, demanding a differential duty. The applicant sought a waiver of the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The contention revolved around the addition of notional interest on booking advances and security deposits. The appellant had received booking advances prior to the relevant period and claimed that the entire amount was deposited, not just 50% as required, and hence, not used as working capital during the period under question. The second aspect involved security deposits from spare parts dealers, with the adjudicating authority asserting that these amounts were utilized in manufacturing vehicles, imposing notional interest. The applicant argued that the security amounts were unrelated to vehicle prices and that booking advances were not linked to wholesale prices. The applicant successfully argued for a waiver of pre-deposit, as the Tribunal found that the applicant had presented a prima facie arguable case, granting a stay on the collection of the differential duty during the appeal process. The decision was in favor of the applicant, allowing the application for waiver of pre-deposit.