9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Condonation of delay in filing an appeal under the Customs Act.
In this judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, MADRAS, the issue at hand was the condonation of a delay of 17 days in filing an appeal beyond the prescribed period of 3 months under the Customs Act. The appellant sought condonation, citing a misunderstanding by a new case worker regarding the timeline for filing the appeal. The Tribunal requested case records to substantiate the claim and inquired about the supervision and hierarchy for monitoring appeal filings. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a valid reason to condone any delay and questioned the lack of evidence supporting the appellant's explanation for the delay. The Tribunal noted that a letter within the limitation period was sent by the Assistant Commissioner to ascertain the acceptance of the Order-in-Appeal, but no further details were provided regarding the decision-making process for filing the appeal. The appellant's representative mentioned a misunderstanding by the dealing Assistant as the reason for the delay but could not confirm if any action was taken against the Assistant or elaborate on the monitoring process for appeal filings. The absence of the respondents was also highlighted during the proceedings. Ultimately, the Tribunal emphasized that while the delay may seem minimal, condonation requires a valid and acceptable reason, which was lacking in this case. The Tribunal found the appellant's explanation insufficient, noting the absence of evidence supporting the misunderstanding by the dealing Assistant and the failure of supervisory levels to ensure timely appeal filing. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the plea for condonation of delay, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as time-barred under the Customs Act.
|
