1997 (7) TMI 308 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues:
1. Interpretation of Notification No. 54/64-C.E. and Notification No. 164/78-C.E.
2. Classification of iron and steel products under Tariff Items.
3. Correct reading of the Notification and its implications.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Interpretation of Notification No. 54/64-C.E. and Notification No. 164/78-C.E.
The case involves the interpretation of Notification No. 54/64-C.E., as amended by Notification No. 164/78-C.E., concerning the exemption of scrap produced during the manufacture of goods falling under Tariff Items 25 and 26. The Revenue authorities questioned the benefit availed under this Notification by the respondents, leading to a show cause notice. The Board raised concerns regarding the classification of the scrap involved in the case and the applicability of the said Notifications. The Order No. 49-R, dated 6-10-1989, highlighted this issue, which formed the basis of the appeal filed by the Collector of Central Excise, Patna.

Issue 2: Classification of iron and steel products under Tariff Items
The Tribunal examined the wording of the Notification to determine the correctness of the point raised by the Board. The Notification exempts scrap iron and steel melting scrap falling under item Nos. 25 and 26, obtained in the manufacture of iron and steel products. It specifies that the iron and steel products should be from specific sources that have already paid the appropriate duty. The Tribunal emphasized that the Notification does not mandate the iron and steel products to fall under Tariff Item 26AA, contrary to the Revenue's contention. The Tribunal concluded that the Revenue's interpretation was incorrect based on a plain reading of the Notification.

Issue 3: Correct reading of the Notification and its implications
The JDR for the Revenue argued that the iron and steel products should be classified under Tariff Item 26AA based on the expression "obtained in the manufacture of iron and steel products." However, the Tribunal rejected this argument, stating that adding words like "falling under Tariff Item 26AA" would be impermissible as they were not present in the Notification. The Tribunal upheld its decision, emphasizing that the Notification should be interpreted as written, without introducing additional criteria. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming that the Notification did not require the iron and steel products to fall under Tariff Item 26AA for the exemption to apply.