9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Appeal against suspension of Custom House Agent license under Rule 21(2) of Custom House Agent Regulation, 1984. Analysis: The judgment involves an appeal against the suspension of a Custom House Agent license under Rule 21(2) of the Custom House Agent Regulation, 1984. The Commissioner suspended the license based on an employee's fraudulent activities, where the employee obtained refund orders in collusion with a department employee, resulting in a substantial amount. The Collector held the appellant's firm responsible for not properly controlling its employee's actions. However, the responsibility of the Agent in the acts was not clear, and the matter was under investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The departmental representative failed to provide evidence of the involvement of the firm's Director or other employees in the fraud. It was clarified that the firm did not handle customs duty transactions related to M/s. Modest Maritime Services. The judgment highlighted the requirement for a Custom House Agent to exercise supervision and control over its employees as per the regulations. While acknowledging the lack of proper supervision by the firm, the Tribunal found that this alone was not sufficient to warrant the suspension of the license under Regulation 21(2). The Tribunal emphasized that the provision should be invoked only when necessary to immediately stop the agent's functioning to safeguard the interests of the Custom House. The principles of natural justice, as outlined in the regulations, should not be disregarded without a clear demonstration of such necessity, which was not evident in this case. Considering the lack of evidence implicating the firm's Director or other employees in the fraudulent activities, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the Commissioner's order suspending the license. However, it was clarified that this decision did not prevent the Commissioner from exercising powers under Rule 23(3) if deemed necessary. The Tribunal also expressed dissatisfaction with the progress of the investigation and the lack of clarity regarding the CBI's involvement, indicating the need for a more transparent and thorough inquiry process to establish accountability accurately.
|
