9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Classification of imported goods as melting scrap or old, used, rusted pipes. Analysis: The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi involved the classification of goods imported by M/s. Antartic Industries Ltd. as either melting scrap or old, used, rusted pipes. The Commissioner of Customs, Kandla, confiscated the goods for misdeclaration, stating that they were serviceable pipes requiring a license under the Exim Policy. The appellants argued that the imported goods, consisting of 80% old pipes and 20% scraps, were intended for manufacturing M.S. Ingots in an induction furnace. They requested mutilation of the pipes under Section 24 of the Customs Act 1962, citing previous cases and CBEC guidelines allowing such mutilation for assessment as steel scrap. The appellants contended that they were actual users of the goods and should be allowed to mutilate the pipes for use in their furnace. They referenced a previous adjudication order and relevant case law to support their argument that the goods should be released without confiscation or value enhancement. The appellants emphasized the technological advancements in the steel industry, stating that size should not be the sole criterion for classifying steel scraps. They also highlighted the benefit of doubt in their favor, as no penalty was imposed by the adjudicating authority. On the other hand, the Department argued that a license was required for importing pipes, not disputed by the appellants. They contended that the importers had brought in pipes instead of scraps, leading to a higher valuation. The Department refuted the relevance of the appellants' arguments regarding actual usage, citing discrepancies in declared values and the limited scope of Section 24 of the Customs Act. They dismissed the applicability of the case laws cited by the appellants, asserting that the issues in those cases were distinct from the present matter. After considering both parties' submissions, the Tribunal noted that the imported goods indeed contained old, used, and rusted pipes. They acknowledged the importer's intent to use the goods as scrap in their induction furnace and the application for mutilation post-examination. Referring to a Board's letter supporting the conversion of serviceable goods into scrap for assessment, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellants. They held that the Commissioner should have permitted mutilation before clearance, with the valuation post-mutilation to be considered as scrap, aligning with the Board's guidelines. Consequently, the appeal by the appellants was allowed, overturning the confiscation of the goods.
|
