Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1999 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1999 (2) TMI 177 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
- Disallowance of Modvat credit on inputs used for manufacturing audio cassettes
- Classification of audio shells and payment of duty
- Declaration under Rule 57G for final products
- Admissibility of Modvat credit for duty paid inputs
- Interpretation of Modvat Scheme provisions

Analysis:
1. Disallowance of Modvat Credit: The appeal was against the Collector (Appeals), Ghaziabad's order disallowing Modvat credit on inputs used for manufacturing audio cassettes. The appellants had been clearing audio shells free of duty until audio cassettes became duty-exempt. Subsequently, they paid duty on the shells and utilized Modvat credit. The Department contended that credit was inadmissible for items not declared as final products.

2. Classification and Duty Payment: The Advocate argued that the appellants had declared the shells as intermediate stage inputs for audio cassettes' manufacture. The Departmental Representative emphasized that credit was not admissible for undeclared final products. The Tribunal noted that the inputs were used in the manufacture of dutiable products, making Modvat admissible.

3. Declaration under Rule 57G: The Tribunal observed that the items were declared in a filing on 27-3-1990, establishing the factual position. The purpose of the declaration was to inform the department of the manufacturing process, and the change in duty liability did not affect Modvat eligibility.

4. Admissibility of Modvat Credit: The Tribunal held that since duty-paid inputs were used for cleared products, Modvat credit was admissible. It emphasized substantial compliance with the Modvat Scheme's essential features, disregarding technical errors.

5. Interpretation of Modvat Scheme: The Tribunal distinguished a previous case where no declaration was filed, emphasizing that in the present case, a declaration existed, disclosing the manufacturing process. Due to substantial compliance with legal requirements, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.

In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing Modvat credit for duty-paid inputs used in manufacturing audio cassettes. The decision highlighted the importance of declarations under Rule 57G and substantial compliance with the Modvat Scheme's provisions for eligibility of benefits.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates