9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Valuation of imported machinery including dismantling charges, assessment of duty, penalty imposition under Customs Act, satisfaction of bond terms, calculation of actual freight charges, exchange rate consideration in valuation.
In this case, the appellants purchased a Water Hydraulic Extrusion Press Plant and sought clearance under the EPCG Scheme. Customs Authorities doubted the declared value and conducted an investigation, concluding that dismantling costs should be added to the invoice price for duty assessment. The Adjudicating Authority finalized the valuation by including dismantling charges and additional expenses, imposing a penalty under the Customs Act. The importer disputed the assessment, offering to pay duty on actual freight costs based on relevant documents. The Tribunal directed the Authority to re-compute freight charges and assess duty accordingly, considering the importer's submission. The main dispute centered around adding dismantling charges to the machinery's value for duty assessment. The importer argued that the ex-factory price paid was accurate and questioned the necessity of adding dismantling costs. The Tribunal found errors in the Authority's decision, highlighting discrepancies in the valuation process based on invoices and letters. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order loading the machinery's value with dismantling charges. Another issue raised was the calculation of duty exceeding the amount specified in the license, with the importer contending that prevailing exchange rates were not considered. The Tribunal agreed with the importer, directing a re-examination of the goods' value without including dismantling charges to ensure compliance with the license limit. Additionally, the Tribunal revoked the penalty imposed under the Customs Act, citing lack of justification based on the case's circumstances. Regarding the bond terms, the Tribunal set aside the adjustment of bond amount towards differential duty, emphasizing the need for a fresh assessment based on the revised directions. The Tribunal instructed the Adjudicating Authority to promptly reevaluate the duty assessment, considering actual freight charges and exchange rate implications. The Authority was directed to pass a new order within two months, ensuring the importer's opportunity to be heard during the process.
|
