9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Appeal against duty confirmation, interest on capital goods, and consumables under 100% EoU scheme; Personal penalty under Customs Act; Cancellation of in bond manufacturing license; Confiscation of capital goods. Analysis: The appeal challenged an order confirming duty, interest, and penalty under the Customs Act for misuse of the 100% EoU scheme, along with the cancellation of a manufacturing license and liability for confiscation of duty-free imported capital goods. The appellant's advocate argued that export obligations were met, and the 100% EoU status was extended by the Government. The Tribunal stayed the cancellation of customs bonded facilities pending appeal, emphasizing the need for coordination between authorities. The advocate contended that the premises were suitable, and the order was based on improper considerations and conflicting conclusions. The Department's representative highlighted instances of duty-free imports during a period of no export performance, emphasizing the duty liability. The Collector's decision was defended as safeguarding revenue, albeit lacking guidance from subsequent regulations. The Tribunal acknowledged the Collector's jurisdiction but noted the conflicting outcomes of canceling facilities while the 100% EoU status continued. The lack of coordination between authorities and absence of guiding circular during the Collector's decision were recognized as problematic. The Tribunal found merit in the advocate's arguments regarding the premises' initial suitability and the need for a review of the abrupt conclusions in the impugned order. Consequently, the order was set aside, and the matter remanded for fresh consideration, including updated evidence on export performance. The Tribunal suggested necessary modifications for customs bonded operations, emphasizing a just resolution. The order-in-original was overturned, and the remand directed the original authority to expedite the adjudication due to the case's age. In conclusion, the appeal succeeded through remand, highlighting the need for a comprehensive review of evidence, coordination between authorities, and just resolution in the interest of justice.
|
