9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Company's inability to pay its debts. 2. Suspension of the company's business for more than a year. 3. Whether it is just and equitable to wind up the company. Detailed Analysis: 1. Company's Inability to Pay its Debts The petitioner, the State of Andhra Pradesh, sought to wind up the Hyderabad Vegetable Products Co. Ltd. under section 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, on the grounds of the company's inability to pay its debts. The petitioner claimed that the company owed a total of Rs. 20,97,534-27 nP., comprising Rs. 15,00,000 towards the principal of loans and Rs. 5,97,534-27 nP. towards interest. The petitioner had made a statutory demand for repayment, which the company neglected to satisfy within the stipulated three weeks, thus fulfilling the conditions under section 434(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956. The respondent argued that there was an agreement in 1951 where the petitioner agreed to write off Rs. 3,00,000 and convert Rs. 3,00,000 into shares. However, the petitioner contended that the agreement was conditional upon the reduction of the company's capital by 50% and the transfer of the managing agency, conditions that were not fulfilled. The court found that there was no bona fide dispute regarding a substantial part of the debt, as the company admitted liability for Rs. 9,00,000 out of Rs. 15,00,000. 2. Suspension of Business for More than a Year The company had suspended its business since August 26, 1952, and had not resumed production for about eight years. The court noted that while the company cited labor trouble as a reason for the suspension, the fact remained that the factory had been closed, which justified a winding-up order under section 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. 3. Just and Equitable to Wind Up the Company The court examined the financial position of the company, which had incurred heavy losses over the years, amounting to Rs. 20,41,716-10-1 by December 31, 1958. The company's assets were insufficient to meet its liabilities, and there was no reasonable hope of resuming profitable operations. The court found that the object of trading at a profit had substantially failed, and it was impossible to carry on the business except at a loss. The court emphasized that the company was commercially insolvent, with negligible cash on hand and in bank accounts. Conclusion The court concluded that the company was unable to pay its debts, had suspended its business for more than a year, and it was just and equitable to wind up the company. Consequently, the court ordered the winding up of the Hyderabad Vegetable Products Co. Ltd. under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. The official liquidator was directed to take charge of the company's property and effects, and the petitioner was instructed to advertise the winding-up order and serve a certified copy on the Registrar of Companies. The costs of the petition were to be paid out of the company's assets.
|
