9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Determination of the relevant date for assessing the rate of duty on goods cleared from a warehouse after the expiry of the warehousing period.
Analysis: 1. Facts of the Case: The case involved a dispute where the respondents filed a Bill of Entry for warehousing 1117 MTs of remelting scrap and waste of iron and steel. The warehousing period was to expire on 2-12-1991, and despite requests for extension due to labor unrest, they were informed to clear the goods. The goods were later assessed at a higher duty rate without considering subsequent Notifications. 2. Relevant Date for Duty Assessment: The issue was referred to a Larger Bench to determine the relevant date for assessing duty on goods cleared after the warehousing period. The Larger Bench held that the relevant date is the date of deemed removal from the warehouse. If a notice under Section 72 is issued, the duty rate is as of the deemed removal date; if cleared under Section 68, duty is as of the payment date. 3. Arguments and Decision: The parties argued whether the case fell under Section 68 or Section 72 of the Customs Act. The Tribunal clarified that for goods cleared after the warehousing period, assessment should be as per Section 72. The duty rate applicable is that of the deemed removal date, in this case, before the issuance of relevant Notifications. 4. Conclusion: The Tribunal upheld that the duty rate applicable to the imported goods was as of the expiry of the warehousing period, not considering subsequent Notifications. The Board's Circular supporting a different interpretation was deemed irrelevant due to Supreme Court rulings. In summary, the judgment clarified the relevant date for assessing duty on goods cleared after the warehousing period, emphasizing the importance of Section 72 for such cases and disregarding conflicting interpretations from the Board's Circular.
|
