9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of Section 391(1) of the Companies Act regarding the right to make an application for sanction of a scheme when a company is in liquidation. Validity of the judgment dismissing the application by the contributories of a company in liquidation. Analysis: The judgment in question arises from an appeal regarding the dismissal of an application by the contributories of a company in liquidation under sections 391(1), 392, and 393 of the Companies Act. The learned judge dismissed the application based on two main grounds, one being that the application was not maintainable as the company was in liquidation, and the other being that the application was not bona fide and did not present a proper case. The appellant contended that the views expressed by the trial judge were incorrect, arguing that section 391(1) does not restrict the right to make an application for a scheme only to the official liquidator when the company is in liquidation. Reference was made to the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, and relevant case law to support this argument. Upon a thorough analysis of section 391 of the Companies Act, the High Court of Calcutta concluded that the legislature intended to preserve the rights of contributories and creditors even when a company is in liquidation. The court emphasized that the liquidator gains an additional right in such circumstances, but it does not negate the rights of other stakeholders. The court also referred to relevant rules and forms under the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, to support this interpretation. The court cited precedents from the Madras High Court and the Travancore-Cochin High Court, which held similar views regarding the interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Companies Act. These judgments emphasized that even after a company is ordered to be wound up, creditors and members retain the right to make applications for schemes, alongside the liquidator. While the court upheld the appellant's contention regarding the interpretation of section 391(1), it ultimately agreed with the trial judge's decision to dismiss the application on its merits. The court noted the circumstances of the case, including the sale of assets and legal issues with the factory site lease, and found that the application did not present a viable scheme for consideration at meetings of creditors and contributories. In conclusion, the High Court of Calcutta upheld the right of contributories and creditors to make applications under section 391(1) even when a company is in liquidation. However, the court found that the dismissal of the application on its merits by the trial judge was justified. The appeal was dismissed, and all interim orders were vacated, with costs awarded to the official liquidator.
|
