1971 (7) TMI 97 - HC - Companies Law

Circumstances in which a company may be wound up, Winding up - Company when deemed unable to pay its debts, General

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the winding-up petition.
2. Enforcement of arbitration award.
3. Bona fide dispute and counterclaim by the company.
4. Socio-economic impact of winding up the company.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of the Winding-Up Petition:
The primary issue is whether the winding-up petition constitutes an abuse of the process of the court. The court must determine if a winding-up order can be passed based on the petitioning creditor's claim, which arises from a transaction involving the sale of cotton to the company. The claim was adjudicated by the East India Cotton Association Limited's arbitration, resulting in an award favoring the petitioning creditor. The company did not satisfy the award, leading to the filing of the winding-up petition. The court emphasized that winding-up petitions are not an alternative to the usual debt realization procedures but a summary mode of equitable execution. The court must consider the relationship between the parties, the nature of the transaction, the company's financial condition, and the nature of the disputes raised.

2. Enforcement of Arbitration Award:
The contract between the parties included an arbitration clause governed by the rules of the East India Cotton Association Limited. The arbitration resulted in an award, which the company failed to pay. The petitioning creditor sought to enforce the award through a winding-up petition. The court noted that under the arbitration agreement, the award has not been filed in court nor set aside. The petitioning creditor argued that the award is final and binding, citing the Supreme Court decision in *Satish Kumar v. Surinder Kumar*, which held that an award has legal effect and is not mere waste paper. The court acknowledged that an award could be enforced by obtaining a judgment upon it or through a winding-up petition, as a legitimate mode of equitable execution.

3. Bona Fide Dispute and Counterclaim by the Company:
The company raised a bona fide dispute, arguing that the petitioning creditor's firm and its sister concerns had mutual dealings with the company. The company claimed a counterclaim against one of the sister concerns, Sree Annapurna Financial Corporation, for a substantial sum, and a suit was already pending in the court. The company also alleged that some cheques issued by the petitioning creditor and its sister concerns had been dishonored. The court found that the company's contention of a counterclaim and the disputes raised were not without basis and constituted a bona fide dispute.

4. Socio-Economic Impact of Winding Up the Company:
The court considered the socio-economic implications of winding up the company, which is a State of West Bengal undertaking employing a large number of persons. The court emphasized that winding up the company would not be proper, given the potential socio-economic problems it could create. The court concluded that the petitioning creditor could realize its dues through the enforcement of the award by filing it under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act and obtaining a judgment upon it.

Conclusion:
The court held that the winding-up petition should not be admitted and constituted an abuse of the process of the court. The petitioning creditor had the option to enforce the award through the proper legal channels, and the disputes raised by the company were bona fide. Considering the socio-economic impact, the court decided that it would be improper to make a winding-up order. Consequently, the winding-up petition was taken off the file with no order as to costs.

← Previous Next →