Rule 31 - Within sixty days, from ...... - Rules of Determination of Origin of Goods under the Preferential Trading Agreement between the Republic of India and the Republic of Chile Rules, 2007

1 [ Rule 31 Within sixty days, from the receipt of the communication as provided in rule 25 or in the sub-rule (3) of rule 28, in case the measure is inconsistent, the exporting Party may request for consultation to the Joint Administration Committee referred to in Article XVII of this Agreement, stating the technical and legal reasons that would indicate that the measure adopted by the competent authorities of the importing Party are not consistent with these rules; and/or request a technical advice with the aim of establishing whether the goods under verification fulfil the requirements of these rules.] --------------- Notes:- 1. Substituted vide Not. 48/2017 - Dated 16-5-2017 before it was read as, Rule 31 <!--?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /--> 1. Once the investigation establishes the non‑qualification of the origin criterion of the goods contained in the origin certificate, the duties shall be levied as if the goods were imported from thirdcountries and the sanctions foreseen in this Agreement and/or the ones foreseen in the legislation in force in each Party shall be applied. 2. In such a case, the competent authorities of the importing Party may deny preferential tariff treatment to new imports relating to identical good from the same producer, until it is clearly demonstrated that the manufacturing conditions were modified so as to fulfil the origin requirements of the Rules of Origin of . 3. Once the competent authorities of the exporting Party has sent the information demonstrating that the manufacturing conditions were modified and goods fulfil the origin criterion, the competent authorities of the importing Party shall have forty five (45) days, from the date of the receipt of the said information, to communicate its decision there upon, or a maximum of ninety (90) days if a new verification visit to the producer's premises, according to Article 23 (e), is deemed necessary. 4. lf the competent authorities of the importing and the exporting Parties fail to agree on the demonstration of the modification of the manufacturing conditions, they may make use of the Dispute Settlement Procedure established as per Article XVIII of the Preferential Trade Agreement between the <!--?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /--> Republic of India and the Republic of Chile .