Article Section | |||||||||||
Home Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST CA Bimal Jain Experts This |
|||||||||||
Assessee entitled to interest on GST Refund from the date of expiry of 60 days of the application filed pursuant to refund claim attaining finality |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Discuss this article |
|||||||||||
Assessee entitled to interest on GST Refund from the date of expiry of 60 days of the application filed pursuant to refund claim attaining finality |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of BANSAL INTERNATIONAL VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF DGST AND ANR. - 2023 (11) TMI 958 - DELHI HIGH COURT allowed the writ petition and held that interest at the rate of six percent would be payable for the period which commences from the date immediately after the expiry of sixty days from the first application till the filing of the second application according to the appellate orders. Facts: Arun Bansal (“the Petitioner”) is engaged in the business of export of goods operating under the name and style of proprietorship concern, Bansal International. The Petitioner filed an application for claiming of refund of Input Tax Credit (“ITC”) in respect of the goods exported without the payment of tax in the month of November 2019. The Petitioner's application for refund was acknowledged by the Revenue Department (“the Respondent”), however, the Respondent vide Order dated November 10, 2020, sanctioned a refund amount of Rs. 1,08,293/- but rejected the remaining refund claim of Rs.52,84,223/- as not tenable under Section 62(2)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”). Aggrieved by the Order, the Petitioner filed an appeal before the Respondent Appellate Authority. The Appeal was allowed, and the Petitioner was directed to file a fresh application for a refund. However, the amount of Interest was denied by the Respondent. The Petitioner filed a fresh application for refund along with interest. The Respondent vide order dated December 28, 2022, sanctioned refund amount but interest on the said amount was denied. The Petitioner further filed an application for claiming interest on the amount of refund which was rejected by the Respondent vide order dated July 11, 2023 (“the Impugned Order”). Aggrieved by the Impugned Order, the Petitioner filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court for claiming interest on the refund amount pertaining to the tax period November 2019. Issue: Whether the Assessee is entitled to interest on GST Refund from the date of expiration of 60 days of the first application filed when the subsequent application for refund is filed as per Appellate Order? Held: The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of BANSAL INTERNATIONAL VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF DGST AND ANR. - 2023 (11) TMI 958 - DELHI HIGH COURT held as under:
(Author can be reached at [email protected])
By: CA Bimal Jain - December 9, 2023
|
|||||||||||
Discuss this article |
|||||||||||