Article Section | |||||||||||
Home Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST CA Bimal Jain Experts This |
|||||||||||
GSTR-1 can be rectified post due-date of furnishing details of outward supplies under Section 37(1) of the CGST Act |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Discuss this article |
|||||||||||
GSTR-1 can be rectified post due-date of furnishing details of outward supplies under Section 37(1) of the CGST Act |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of STAR ENGINEERS (I) PVT. LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA, STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX-GST. [2023 (12) TMI 729 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] allowed rectification of Form GSTR-1, post due-date of furnishing details of outward supplies under Section 37(1) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”), thereby holding that, Section 37(3) of the CGST Act, cannot be interpreted in a manner that would prevent the Assessee from placing the correct position and accurate details with respect to all the details in GST Returns being filed by the Assessee. Facts: Star Engineers India (I) Pvt. Ltd. (“the Petitioner”) is engaged in the designing, developing, manufacturing and supplying electronic components for industrial purposes. The Petitioner supplied goods to Bajaj Auto Limited (“the Recipient”) as per the delivery terms specified in the purchase order received from the Recipient. The Petitioner during the Financial Year (“FY”) 2021-2022, supplied goods to various third-party vendors and generated invoices “Bill-to-Ship-to-Model” as per the instructions received from the Recipient. The Petitioner during the said period, correctly issued the required invoices and credit notes in favour of the Recipient, appropriately citing GST Identification Number (“GSTIN”). However, at the time of filing Form GSTR-1, for the period of July 2021, November, 2021 and January 2022 (“the Impugned Period”), GSTIN of third parties to whom shipment was delivered, was reported instead of declaring the GSTIN of the Recipient. Due to aforementioned situation, the invoices submitted by the Petitioner, could not appear in the Recipient Form GSTR-2B but appeared inadvertently in third-party vendors Form GSTR-2B, leading to inability of the Recipient to claim Input Tax Credit (“ITC”) for the invoices. The Recipient, at the time of processing the payment of the Petitioner for the Impugned Period, reduced the amount which was equivalent to the GST amount paid, interalia, stating that, the Recipient has not claimed the said invoices for availing ITC as the details of the said invoices are not appearing in Form GSTR-2B as GSTIN of third party was given, thereby debiting mismatched amount to the Petitioner account. Thereafter, the Petitioner approached the Revenue Department (“the Respondent”) vide letter dated September 11, 2023 for granting permission to rectify Form GSTR-1, interalia, stating that, the Petitioner has fulfilled the tax obligation, in relation to the supplies made to the Recipient during the Impugned Period and all the required taxes pertaining to transactions with the Recipient, have been duly paid by the Petitioner to the government, thus, complying with all the GST regulations. However, the Petitioner request was rejected vide Communication dated September 27, 2023 (“the Impugned Communication”) issued by the Respondent. Aggrieved by the Impugned Communication, the Petitioner filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble Bombay High Court. Issue: Whether Form GSTR-1 can be rectified post due-date of furnishing details of outward supplies under Section 37(1) of the CGST Act? Held: The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of STAR ENGINEERS (I) PVT. LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA, STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX-GST. [2023 (12) TMI 729 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] held as under:
(Author can be reached at [email protected])
By: CA Bimal Jain - January 16, 2024
|
|||||||||||
Discuss this article |
|||||||||||