Article Section | |||||||||||
Home Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST CA Bimal Jain Experts This |
|||||||||||
GST Registration be restored if Assessee files pending returns and pays taxes along with interest and penalty |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Discuss this article |
|||||||||||
GST Registration be restored if Assessee files pending returns and pays taxes along with interest and penalty |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
The Hon’ble Guwahati High Court in the case of SANJOY NATH VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS, THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER CGST CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, THE SUPERINTENDENT CGST BONGAIGAON-4 ASSAM [2023 (12) TMI 160 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT] disposed of the writ petition, thereby directing the Revenue Department to take necessary steps for restoring the Petitioner’s GST registration if the Petitioner is willing to comply with all the requirements stated in the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (“the CGST Rules”) which includes furnishing of pending returns and payment of taxes along with interest and penalty. Facts: Revenue Department (“the Respondent”) issued Show Cause Notice dated July 8, 2022 (“the SCN”) against Sanjoy Nath (“the Petitioner”) a sole proprietorship firm, as to why the Petitioner GST registration should not be cancelled due to non-furnishing of returns as required under Section 39 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”) for a continuous period of six months. The Respondent vide order dated August 11, 2022 (“the Impugned Order”) cancelled Petitioner GST Registration under Section 29(2)(c) of the CGST Act read with Rule 22 of the CGST Rules due to aforesaid reason. Aggrieved by the Impugned Order, the Petitioner filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble Guwahati High Court for restoring the Petitioner's GST registration. Issue: Whether GST Registration be restored if Assessee files pending returns and pays the taxes along with interest and penalty? Held: The Hon’ble Guwahati High Court in the case of SANJOY NATH VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS, THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER CGST CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, THE SUPERINTENDENT CGST BONGAIGAON-4 ASSAM [2023 (12) TMI 160 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT] held as under:
Relevant Provision: Rule 22(4) of CGST Rules; “Rule 22: Cancellation of Registration:- (4) Where the reply furnished under sub-rule (2) or in response to the notice issued under sub-rule (2A) of rule 21A is found to be satisfactory, the proper officer shall drop the proceedings and pass an order in FORM GST REG–20: Provided that where the person instead of replying to the notice served under sub-rule (1) for contravention of the provisions contained in clause (b) or clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 29, furnishes all the pending returns and makes full payment of the tax dues along with applicable interest and late fee, the proper officer shall drop the proceedings and pass an order in FORM GST-REG- 20.” Author can be reached at [email protected])
By: CA Bimal Jain - February 2, 2024
|
|||||||||||
Discuss this article |
|||||||||||