Article Section | |||||||||||
Home Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST CA Bimal Jain Experts This |
|||||||||||
Perquisites provided by the employer to the employee under the contractual agreement would not be considered as Supply under GST |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Discuss this article |
|||||||||||
Perquisites provided by the employer to the employee under the contractual agreement would not be considered as Supply under GST |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
The Gujarat AAR in the matter of IN RE: M/S. KOHLER INDIA CORPORATION PVT LTD. - 2024 (1) TMI 703 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT held that where the Applicant under the Factories Act, 1948 (“the Factories Act”) entered into a contract with the canteen service provider (“CSP") to provide canteen facilities to workers, then the deductions made by the Applicant from the employees availing food in the factory would not be considered as a 'supply'. Thus, the GST would not apply to the employee's portion. Further, an Input Tax Credit (“ITC”) will be available to the Applicant with respect to food and beverages as the canteen facility is obligated under the Factories Act. Facts: Kohler India Corporation Private Limited (“the Applicant”) was engaged in the manufacturing of plumbing products for kitchens & bathrooms. Their manufacturing facility was in Gujarat and was governed by the provisions of the Factories Act. In terms of Section 46 of the Factories Act, if more than a specified number of workers are employed, the employer must provide canteen facilities. Therefore, the Applicant entered into a contract with the CSP to provide canteen facilities to their workers of the factory premises. As per the agreement with the CSP, the Applicant allows the CSP to use utensils like tea urns, glass tumblers, eating plates steel bowls, and other utensils necessary for the preparation of food and serving food items at the canteen. The CSP raised the invoice along with the applicable GST for its canteen services. The invoice was raised based on the consumption by the employees of the Applicant, which was tracked based on employees of the Applicant who availed the canteen facility. A part of the canteen charges was borne by the Applicant and the remaining is borne by their employees. The employees’ portion of canteen charges were collected from employees’ salaries and paid to the CSP by the Applicant on behalf of the employees. The amount so collected was without any commercial objective, or profit margin and to maintain discipline. The Applicant accounted for the canteen expenses based on the invoice raised by the CSP in its statement of profit and loss account. Further, the amount collected by the Applicant from its employees was credited to the expense account in which the canteen expenses were booked. Hence, the Applicant filed an advance ruling on the following questions: Issues:
Held: The Gujarat AAR in the matter of IN RE: M/S. KOHLER INDIA CORPORATION PVT LTD. - 2024 (1) TMI 703 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT held as under:
(Author can be reached at [email protected])
By: CA Bimal Jain - March 21, 2024
|
|||||||||||
Discuss this article |
|||||||||||