Article Section | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST CA Bimal Jain Experts This |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Superintendent cannot exceed jurisdictional prescribed limits and pass the Order. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discuss this article |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Superintendent cannot exceed jurisdictional prescribed limits and pass the Order. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Mansoori Enterprises v. Union of India [2024 (2) TMI 1183 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] held that according to Circular No. 31/05/2018-GST dated February 09, 2018, power of the Superintendent, Central Goods and Service Tax & Central Excise is limited to the matter not exceeding Rs. 10,00,000/- and in the present case the amount involved is more than Rs. 16,00,000/- and consequently, the order passed by the Superintendent is without jurisdiction. Hence, the said order was declared without jurisdiction and liable to be set aside. Facts: Mansoori Enterprises (“the Petitioner”), challenged the Impugned Order dated November 20, 2023 (“the Impugned Order”), passed by, the Superintendent (“the Respondent”), under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“CGST Act”). The Impugned Order disallowed ITC amounting to Rs. 16,24,246.88. The Petitioner contested the jurisdiction of the Superintendent to pass the order, citing Circular No. 31/05/2018-GST dated February 09, 2018. The Petitioner contended that the Superintendent’s jurisdiction was limited by the circular to matters not exceeding Rs. 10,00,000/- while the amount involved in the case exceeded Rs. 16,00,000/- Hence, aggrieved by the Impugned Order of the Respondent, the Petitioner filed a Writ Petition in the High Court of Allahabad challenging the Superintendent’s jurisdiction to pass the Impugned Order. Issue: Whether the Superintendent have the jurisdiction to pass the Order considering the jurisdictional limits? Held: The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, in 2024 (2) TMI 1183 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT held as under:
Our Comments: For optimal distribution of work relating to the issuance of show cause notices and orders under Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act and also under the IGST Act, monetary limits for different levels of officers of central tax need to be prescribed. Therefore, in pursuance of clause (91) of Section 2 of the CGST Act read with Section 20 of the IGST Act, the Board hereby assigns the officers mentioned in Column (2) of the Table below, the functions as the proper officers in relation to issue of show cause notices and orders under Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act and Section 20 of the IGST Act, up to the monetary limits as mentioned in columns (3), (4) and (5) respectively of the Table below:-
(Author can be reached at [email protected])
By: CA Bimal Jain - April 10, 2024
Discussions to this article
Here is one issue that If CGST Demand is of Rs. 18,00,000/- and IGST Demand is of Rs. 1,00,000/- (i.e. total demand of Rs. 19,00,000/-), can a Superintendent ISSUE NOTICE AND PASS ORDER as per Column (5) of the Monetary Limit UPTO RS. 20 LAKH issued under Circular No. 31/5/2018-GST dated 09.02.2018
Can anybody enlighten on the issue raised by me on 25th June, 2024 ?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discuss this article |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||