Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Article Section

Home Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal Experts This

LITIGATION MANAGEMENT IN GST REGIME (PART -3)

Submit New Article

Discuss this article

LITIGATION MANAGEMENT IN GST REGIME (PART -3)
Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal By: Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
June 6, 2024
All Articles by: Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal       View Profile
  • Contents

Section 75 of CGST Act, 2017, provides for general provisions for determination of tax. This section provides that the period of stay, if any, would be excluded while calculating the time period for issuance of show cause notice or passing of order. The section further provides that the time period during which appeal is pending in any appellate for a would be excluded while calculating the time period for issuance of such notice or passing of order. This section also provides that no such notice needs to be issued for recovery of unpaid  self-assessed tax as per return and interest thereon. This section also provides that the adjudication proceedings shall be deemed to be concluded if the order is not issued within the statutory time limit.

Adjudication is an important function of the tax administration by the proper officers. A fair adjudication ensures that no economic loss is caused to the revenue authorities by alleged contravention by the person.

The authorities exercising quasi-judicial function are duty bound to justify their existence and carry credibility with the people by inspiring confidence in the adjudicatory  process. The public is entitled to have assurance that process of correction is in place and working. It is the requirement of law that correction process of judgments should not only appear to be implemented but also seem to have been properly implemented. These functions, therefore, cast a heavy responsibility on the officers invested with the powers of adjudication and confiscation to use it with utmost care and caution, free from any prejudice or bias, so that the innocent does not suffer by any injustice done to him and the real offender does not escape the punishment provided by law.

Adjudication Order

  • The issuance of a Show Cause Notice logically comes to an end by issuance of an order called adjudication order also called as Order-in-Original (OIO).
  • The demand proposed in a Show Cause Notice will be dropped or confirmed by the order.
  • The order is issued by the officer, called adjudicating authority who adjudicates the Show Cause Notice.
  • The order generally contains the following –
    • Background and brief facts of Show Cause Notice
    • Reply to Show Cause Notice, if any (defence grounds)
    • Personal hearing (who attended, when)
    • Discussions and findings (Analysis)
    • Conclusion or order.
  • An order shall follow the following principles / doctrines:
  • legislative intention
  • reasoned or speaking order
  • natural justice
  • judicial discipline
  • res judicata
  • noscitur-a-sociis
  • A sustainable order is complete, legally compliant, unambiguous and properly drafted with quantified demand of tax, and penalties.
  • Non-speaking and vague order ought to be avoided.
  • A proper adjudication order must be a speaking or well reasoned order
  • Order should be in writing, numbered, dated and signed by the adjudicating authority.

Adjudication Order – How to read and make sense

On receiving the adjudication order issued by the adjudicating authority (proper officer), the taxpayer should know / ascertain the following:

  • Ascertain whether the order (Order-in-Original or OIO) is complete in all respects, i.e., dated, numbered, signed etc.
  • Ascertain whether the order is within prescribed limitation period.
  • If under CGST law, OIO should contain Document Identification Number (DIN) without which it will not be considered as a valid document. It may be noted that certain states have also started assigning document reference number.
  • Check if OIO is complete as seen from page numbering and contains annexures / computation sheet etc as mentioned in the OIO.
  • Verify as to OIO contains correct facts of noticee as well as details of personal hearing, dates etc.
  • Ascertain that OIO is not vague in content and contains demand of tax, interest and penalties, if any, properly quantified.
  • Ascertain if the OIO contains any mistake or error which is apparent from record and which calls for action under section 161 of the CGST Act, 2017 for rectification of mistake.
  • Whether all the grounds / contentions of noticee have been considered and addressed.
  • No demand can be confirmed on the ground other than grounds specified in the SCN.
  • Whether the OIO has travelled beyond the scope of the SCN itself.
  • Take note if the order is in violation of principle of natural justice. If so, it will have to be challenged accordingly.
  • An OIO has to be a well reasoned / speaking order. If not so, it is a defective order which can be legally challenged.
  • An OIO shall follow binding precedents and judicial discipline.
  • An OIO may confirm the demand in full or allow partial or full relief. OIO can also order to drop the SCN proceedings.
  • Further line of action by the assessee would be taken once the OIO is read and understood.

 

By: Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal - June 6, 2024

 

 

Discuss this article

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates