Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Article Section

Home Articles Value Added Tax - VAT and CST AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE Experts This

Time barred assessment is void ab-initio,no need to deposit 25% u/s 62(5) under PVAT Act, 2005

Submit New Article
Time barred assessment is void ab-initio,no need to deposit 25% u/s 62(5) under PVAT Act, 2005
AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE By: AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE
February 16, 2012
All Articles by: AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE       View Profile
  • Contents

Punjab VAT Tribunal in a very important case namely Baba Ji Rice Mills, vs. State of Punjab (2012) 41 PHT 197 (PVT)has held that once the case is hit by point of limitation,payment of 25% of the additional demand not essentially to be adjudicated.

It is notable here that as per section 62(5) of Punjab VAT Act, 2005 prior payment of 25% of additional demand is mandatory before any appeal is being heard.

In this case the assessment for the year 2005-06 was framed after the limitation period of 3 years u/s 29(4A) of Punjab VAT Act, 2005. The DETC(A) due to non-deposit of prior minimum payment of 25% in terms of section 62(5) , dismissed the appeal.

On further appeal to Tribunal it was held as under:

"In ground No. 3, in the memorandum of appeal filed before Tribunal, it has been averred that "it was argued before the appellate authority that the assessment is hit by limitation as such appellant is not required to deposit 25% of additional demand" but as would be apparent on the face ofthe order dated 30.11.2010 of DETC(A), this point of limitation has not been touched at all. The preceding discussion crystallises the conclusion that the assessmentframed vide order dated 16.2.2010 is barred by limitation. The Ld. councel for the appellant has confined hisarguments to the point of limitation only. He has not agitated any other point taken up in the grounds of appeal.Since, the appeal succeeds on the solitary point of limitation, therefore we need not to go into the discussion on any other point forming part of the grounds of appeal. Virtually the assessment order is void ab-initio, being barred by limitation.

Thus it is clear from the order of Tribunal, once theassessment is being framed after the limitation period, there is no need to adjudicate on any other ground including that of prior payment of 25% u/s 62(5) of PVAT Act, 2005 and such assessment order will be considered as void ab-initio.

Amit Bajaj Advocate

Bajaj & Bajaj Advocates

128, Sangam Complex,

Milap Chowk, Jalandhar(Punjab)

[email protected]

www.amitbajajadvocate.com

+919815243335

 

 

By: AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE - February 16, 2012

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates