Article Section | |||||||||||
Cenvat credit on Outdoor Catering services used in relation to business activities continues to be an eligible Input service even after amendment in the definition of ‘Input services’ w.e.f April 1, 2011 |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Cenvat credit on Outdoor Catering services used in relation to business activities continues to be an eligible Input service even after amendment in the definition of ‘Input services’ w.e.f April 1, 2011 |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Dear Professional Colleague, Cenvat credit on Outdoor Catering services used in relation to business activities continues to be an eligible Input service even after amendment in the definition of ‘Input services’ w.e.f April 1, 2011 We are sharing with you an important judgment of the Hon’ble CESTAT, Mumbai, in the case of Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik [2014 (12) TMI 596 - CESTAT MUMBAI] on following issue: Issue: Whether Cenvat credit on Outdoor Catering services, used in relation to business activities is eligible after amendment in the definition of ‘Input services’ w.e.f April 1, 2011? Facts and background: In the instant case, Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. (“the Appellant”) availed Cenvat credit on Outdoor Catering services for the period December, 2011 to December, 2012, which was denied by the Lower Authorities and the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) on the ground that the definition of Input services given under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 (“the Credit Rules”) has been amended w.e.f April 1, 2011 to specifically exclude any Input service used for personal use or consumption by any employee. Being aggrieved, the Appellant preferred an appeal before the Hon’ble CESTAT, Mumbai, and relying upon Circular D.O.F No. 334/3/2011-TRU dated February 28, 2011 and Circular No. 943/4/2011-CX dated April 29, 2011, submitted the following:
Held: The Hon’ble CESTAT, Mumbai observed the following:
Therefore, on the basis of above, the Hon’ble Tribunal held that since in the instant case, Outdoor Catering services are used by the Appellant in relation to their business activities, cost of which is borne by the Appellant and not by the employees, they are rightly entitled to claim Cenvat credit of the same. Hope the information will assist you in your Professional endeavors. In case of any query/ information, please do not hesitate to write back to us. Thanks and Best Regards, Bimal Jain FCA, FCS, LLB, B.Com (Hons) Flat No. 34B, Ground Floor, Pocket - 1, Mayur Vihar, Phase - I, Delhi – 110091, India Desktel: +91-11-22757595/ 42427056 Mobile: +91 9810604563 Email: [email protected] Web: www.a2ztaxcorp.com
Disclaimer: The contents of this document are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the authors nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this document nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Readers are advised to consult the professional for understanding applicability of this newsletter in the respective scenarios. While due care has been taken in preparing this document, the existence of mistakes and omissions herein is not ruled out. No part of this document should be distributed or copied (except for personal, non-commercial use) without our written permission
By: Bimal jain - December 17, 2014
Discussions to this article
Dear Sir, The subject issue of admissibility of Cenvat Credit of service tax paid on outdoor catering mainly on the employee's share was decided by the Bombay High Court in case of Ultra tech Cement Ltd during 2010.
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||