Article Section | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CENVAT Documents & Related Issues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CENVAT Documents & Related Issues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CENVAT Documents and Related Issues
Background: MODVAT scheme came into existence in 1986 and over a period of 28 years lot of amendments took place, even got renamed as CENVAT, which became effective from 01.04.2000 late the cross availment of credit with service tax and central excise was introduced with effective from 10.09.2004.CENVAT scheme was mainly introduced to avoid cascading effect of tax for making the product competitive in that in the domestic market as well as in international market, indigenous goods, the end user does not pay the price which is including tax paid at multiple stages. CENVAT Scheme under Central Excise and service tax allows credit of specified duties/ service tax paid on eligible Inputs, Capital goods and Input services. CENVAT credit can be availed by Manufacturer of dutiable goods and provider of taxable output service. It can be availed on physical receipt of Inputs and Capital Goods in the factory of manufacturer/ premises of Service provider with specified duty paying documents and input service received with prescribed invoice after receipt of service or on receipt of advances for the services to be provided. Since the CENVAT can be availed on duty paying document, such documents plays a very vital role in availment of the credit, in the opinion of the paper writer the document on which the credit is being availed is as goods a currency note and hence one has to take a special care on the documents on which the credit is intended to be availed. This article aims to giving an overview on the documentation for CENVAT. Rule 9(1) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, specifies the documents on which the CENVAT credit shall be availed by the manufacturer or the provider of output service or input service distributor as the case may be, namely:-
However it is to be noted that the credit of additional duty of customs levied under sub-section (5)of section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) shall not be allowed if the invoice or the supplementary invoice, as the case may be, bears an indication to the effect that no credit of the said additional duty shall be admissible. This is in view of refund eligibility to the seller of the imported goods under notification 102/2007-Cus dated 14.09.2007, in case the buyer avails the credit the there would be a double benefit, to this extent. However it is also important to note that Rule 9(2) requires that a document on which the credit is being availed should be having all the particulars as prescribed under the Central Excise Rules, 2002 or the Service Tax Rules, 1994, as the case may be, are contained in the said document. As per Rule 4A of Service Tax rules, 1994, a service invoice should contain the following particulars:
As per Rule 11 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 a document on which CENVAT credit is taken shall contain the following particulars:
As per above, even though few particulars of invoice are not mandatory, credit can still be allowed by the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise or the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, on being satisfied that the goods or services covered by the said document have been received and accounted for in the books of the account of the receiver. The procedure to be followed in this regard is as follows:
If the Assistant Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner is satisfied, then he may allow the CENVAT Credit on the same. We shall proceed to discuss some of the common issues that arises while availing CENVAT credit
In many cases it is observed that goods purchased from VAT dealers under VAT invoice, since the VAT dealer gives a commercial invoice which is not a prescribed document as discussed above would not eligible for CENVAT credit. At the same time it has to be noted that the price paid by the buyer is inclusive of excise duty.For example: If the value of good “x” is ₹ 100, excise duty on it say is ₹ 20,after adding a profit of say ₹ 20 and VAT liability of ₹ 10, the same will be sold by vat dealer at ₹ 150.On purchase of the same from VAT dealer under VAT invoice the credit of ₹ 20 already paid as excise duty is not available to the buyer. Therefore such buyer ends up paying the excise duty but not in a position to availed the same due to lack of the prescribed document. In such a case, CENVAT credit of excise duty already paid on such goods can be availed by the buyer under the following circumstances:
This is possible only if dealer is not availing CENVAT on the invoice obtained from manufacturer and he is ready to share excise invoice along with VAT invoice.
In commencement of any business whether as a manufacturer or service provider requires huge investment in capital.These costs could be capital in nature as well as revenue in nature. Various fixed assets, goods and services would be procured for setting up the unit. Generally registration of the business unit will take some time, for example, if the business unit is service provider, in such a case, requirement to register will be within 30 days from the date of providing the service and in case of manufacturing unit, if unit is availing SSI exemption after crossing 150 lakhs of turnover. So registration will take place later however expenses will incurred before requirement of registration arises, in such cases, CENVAT Credit paid on the procurement of capital goods and services can be availed is a big time question? Yes, the CENVAT Credit before commencement of business can also be availed as there is an intension to provide the service or manufacturing taxable goods.In case of Showa India (P) Ltd Vs CCE Faridabad, Service Tax 2011 (7) TMI 909 - CESTAT, DELHI, it was held that CENVAT credit should also be allowed on invoices which were issued prior to the registration of company as commencement of business should not be construed as actual production of goods.
Many a times we see the companies/ organization will apply for the change in name of the company/ organization, for example, motor vehicle giant, Hero Honda changed its name to Hero Motor Corp, in such cases, most of the time we see that invoices are still received in the old name of company, may be because of any reason like master file in database not updated etc.., in such cases, CENVAT Credit on those invoices can be availed by the company with new name? In view of paper writer, yes, CENVAT Credit can be still availed though one of the essential conditions to be satisfied to avail the CENVAT credit is that the invoice should be in the name of the buyer of goods or service receiver. However if the invoice is issued in the name of company’s old name or there is change in the name of the company and invoice is issued in the old name of company, then benefit of CENVAT credit can be availed by the new company. In case of Showa India (P) Ltd Vs CCE Faridabad, Service Tax 2011 (7) TMI 909 - CESTAT, DELHI it was held that mere change in the name of company from Evergreen Autocomp India Pvt. Ltd to Showa India, CENVAT credit cannot be denied to the assessee.
In some case it may so happen that a contract is awarded to one person but actually it is performed or carried out by some person either partially or fully, especially in case of government tenders or contracts, where contract or tender is awarded to one person but due to some reason it was performed by other person. For Example: In case of transportation of goods via rail where tender of boggie space or slot to be used is bagged by one person say “X” for a period of 3 years however if “X” is unable to utilize space or not providing transportation of goods via rail and at the same time “Y” has the requirement of boggie space or order to transport the goods via rail but does not have agreement or tender to use such space then in such a case “Y” utilizes “X” space and provide the service and discharges the liability to Railway department then in such a case CENVAT credit cannot be denied to “Y”. However as per Rule 9(5) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 the burden to prove credit is on assessee availing the credit, the assessee should prove that the actual space is used by him. In our case “Y” should prove the actual utilization of space. In the paper writer’s view “Y” should also obtain a declaration or endorsement from “X” that the benefit is actually utilized by them and no credit is availed by “X” so as to ensure smooth credit and less or no intervention of Department. In case of Akshar Courier service Vs CCE, Vadodara 2011 (10) TMI 572 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD it was held that name of service recipient is not an essential requirement for the availment of CENVAT Credit.So CENVAT Credit can be availed by the person who is actually consuming or utilizing the service subject to proving its eligibility.
If the invoice is issued in the name of Head office and if the company has only one factory or manufacturing unit then Head office should not register itself as input service distributor, factory or manufacturing unit can even avail the CENVAT credit of invoice received at head office address. However if the assessee has more than one manufacturing unit then it should register itself as input service distributor and pass on the credit to its unit. However if invoice is received in the name of one unit and the same used by other unit and also availed CENVAT credit on it then the credit availed by other unit cannot be denied. In case of CCE Vs Chemplast Sanmar 2005 (10) TMI 201 - CESTAT, CHENNAI , it was held that the invoice in the name of Plant II while inputs were received and used in Plant I. It was held that CENVAT credit can be availed by Plant I so long as there is no dispute about receipt of use of material.
In some cases it may so happen that capital goods or inputs are used by service provider/contractor in a works contract/jobwork, and then CENVAT credit on the same cannot be availed by the service receiver/manufacturer. In order to avail the same the goods procured by the service provider/contractor though billed on its name should be consigned to service receiver/manufacturer. In other words if the goods are consigned in the name of service receiver/manufacturer though purchased by service provider/contractor then also CENVAT credit of the same can be availed by the service receiver/manufacturer. In case of Rajarambapu Patil SSK Ltd Vs CCE 2006 (10) TMI 310 - CESTAT, MUMBAI, it was held that components and equipments required for sugar plants were purchased/ manufactured by contractor in the name of manufacturer and brought to the factory of manufacturer and used such components and parts for setting up the sugar plant in the assessee’s premises. It was held that assessee should be entitled to CENVAT credit paid on such components and parts which are used in the manufacture of sugar plant installed in their premises.It is also held that it is immaterial whether the payment for the components/accessories has been made by the contractor or the manufacturer of finished goods as it is the factory of the manufacturer of finished goods in whose premises components/parts of machinery is installed which in turn is used for the manufacture of finished dutiable goods
Earlier credit was allowed only on the basis of invoice copy marked as “Duplicate for transport”, now there is no such requirement. Credit is allowed on both original and duplicate copy of invoice marked for buyer or for transport. There are some case laws like BAPL Industries Ltd Vs CCE, Coimbatore 2006 (1) TMI 6 - CESTAT, Chennai or Dhananiwala Textiles (P) Ltd Vs CCE, Hyderabad 2006 (2) TMI 27 - CESTAT, BANGALORE it was held that CENVAT can be taken on the basis of triplicate copy of invoice. However no credit shall be allowed on Xerox or carbon copy of invoice. In CCE Vs Amal Rasayan Ltd 1993 (5) TMI 86 - CEGAT, BOMBAY, it was held that vital question is the receipt of inputs and their use in the manufacture of final products. When these two conditions are satisfied, CENVAT credit cannot be denied for lapse of any procedural matters. Similar view in case of CCE, VAPI VS DNH Spinners 2009 (7) TMI 130 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD was also followed.
CENVAT credit is also available even if the bill of entry is provisionally assessed and finally assessed. If the bill of entry is in the name of head office or where the bill of entry is generated through Electronic data interchange system where there will be no signature on the bill of entry, then CENVAT can be availed on the same if there is a declaration made by the importer of goods to transfer the goods manufacturer and such declaration should be countersigned by the Customs officer. However the endorsement of Bill of entry by Customs Officer has been discontinued as per public bearing no 16/2006 dated 22.3.2006. As per the rule 9(5) of CENVAT Credit Rules,2004 the burden of proof is on manufacturer, there should be proper documentation with regard to receipt and utilization of imported goods needs to be maintained in order to avail the credit.
It has been observed that a CENVAT Credit on most of expenditure incurred on tours and travelling will remain unclaimed or has not been availed by the organizations on account of doubt whether CENVAT credit can be availed or not, whether expenditure on tour and travels will be eligible of CENVAT credit and so many other reasons. In view of writer, the same can be availed provided if proper records in respect to that expenditure are maintained, then eligibility of credit cannot be denied. It has been observed that about 80%-85% of tour and travels are planned well in advance, in such a case, if records like minutes of meeting relating to travel, place and expected date or month of travel are recorded separately and further updating it with precise place, dates, person and days of tour and travel along with details of hotels, ticket details and others then credit cannot be denied as the details and records will prove that expenditure incurred for official purpose. Nexus between expenditure and taxable service/ excisable goods has to be proved before department. As per 9(5) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, burden of proof is in on assessee claiming the credit, proving the nexus cannot deny the credit to the assessee. As per Rule 9(2) if all the particulars as specified under the Central Excise Rules, 2002 or the Service Tax Rules, 1994, but contains only duty payable, description of goods or taxable service or assessable value or registration number under excise or service, name and address of the factory or first stage or second stage dealer or provider of output service, the AC or DC must be satisfied that goods or services covered by the said documents have been received and accounted for in the books of account of receiver and he may allow CENVAT credit. The above are some of the issues covered by this article. In view of Paper writer it is better to intimate the department in case of any discrepancies or issue arises while availing credit before availing the same. (For Feedback or queries mail to [email protected] or [email protected])
By: CA.Sandeep Baheti - April 1, 2015
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||