Article Section | ||||||||||||||
Video Presentation: Changes in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 vide Union Budget 2016 |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Video Presentation: Changes in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 vide Union Budget 2016 |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Effective from April 1, 2016, there are various changes made applicable under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 (“the Credit Rules”), with a view to simplify and rationalize the Credit Rules. The important changes have been discussed along with availment of Cenvat credit of Service tax paid on assignment of right to use of natural resources by the Government or Local Authority or any other person. However, there are wide ramifications entangling the extent/ availment/ utilization of Cenvat credit and reversal required in terms of Rule 6 of the Credit Rules providing for reversal of Cenvat credit in respect of inputs and input services used in manufacture of exempted goods or for provision of exempted services. Further, ‘exempted services’ as defined in Rule 2(e) of the Credit Rules now shall include an activity, which is not a ‘service’ as defined in Section 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Credit Rules is duly amended/ clarified by following Notifications/ Circular as on date.
Now, in order to provide complete understanding of the above discussed provisions and corresponding changes brought vide mentioned Notifications/ Circular, Mr. Bimal Jain has recorded a video presentation titled “Changes in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 vide Union Budget 2016”, for easy digest. The video also captures the important changes with practical illustrations in PPT format, facilitating ease of understanding.
By: CA Bimal Jain - May 3, 2016
Discussions to this article
It was very nice presentation. I appreciate CA Bimal Jain's efforts. Congratulations. --- CMA (Dr.) Anil Anikhindi
An excellent effort to provide insight in new provisions of CCR. A commendable one !!! Apart from the alarming points/open issues discussed in the video, one more point that comes to my mind and may be the cause of future litigation is - The deeming provision of treating Capital goods upto a value of ₹ 10000/- per piece as 'Input' will it not attract the clutches of Rule 6(3) ?
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||