Article Section | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REVERSE CHARGE ON “ANY SERVICE” RECEIVED FROM GOVERNMENT: ALARM BELL FOR ALL BUSINESS ENTITIES FROM 1st APRIL 2016 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REVERSE CHARGE ON “ANY SERVICE” RECEIVED FROM GOVERNMENT: ALARM BELL FOR ALL BUSINESS ENTITIES FROM 1st APRIL 2016 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The striking difference between the Service Tax and Income Tax is that under Income Tax Government is not included in the definition of person and, thus, is not a taxable entity. However, under the Service Tax as per section 65B(37) of the Finance Act, 1994 person includes Government and, thus, the Government is a taxable entity and the services provided by them, unless included in negative list and Mega Exemption Notification, are taxable. Further, the term "Government" which was not defined in the Act or any notification has now been defined by means of a new section 65B(26A). However, many of the services provided by the Government or local authorities are in the negative list. Generally, only those services are taxed where similar or substitutable services are provided by private entities.
As per section 66D(a) of the Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994, the negative list comprised of the following:-
* Substituted by "any service " by the Finance Act, 2015 w.e.f. 1-4-2016. Accordingly, apart from specified services of the Department of Post, services in relation to aircraft or vessel or transportation of goods or passengers, only the support services provided to business entities were excluded from the negative list. Services provided by the Government in terms of sovereign right to business entities, which are not substitutable in any manner by any private entity, were not support services, e.g., grant of mining or licensing rights and, thus, not exigible to service tax. However, the services provided by Police to PSUs or Corporate entities or sports events held by private entities, being support services as similar services can be provided by private entities and would be taxable. In this regard it is important to note the following terms –
Support Service of Government/Local Authority covered under full reverse charge mechanism – The provisions regarding Reverse Charge Mechanism are encapsulated under rule 2(1)(d) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, read with section 68(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 and Notification No. 30/2012-ST, dated 20-6-2012 (as amended). As per rule 2(1)(d) (i) (EE) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, the person liable for paying service tax in relation to support services provided or agreed to be provided by Government or local authority except:
In consonance to above Notification No. 30/2012-ST, dated 20-6-2012 also prescribes that 100% of service tax in respect to support services provided (except renting of immovable property) by Government or Local Authority would be payable by the service recipient.
Section 66D(a)(iv) has been amended, by which for the words "support services" the words "any service" has been substituted with effect from a date to be notified after the enactment of the Finance Bill, 2015. Accordingly, all services provided by the Government or local authority to a business entity, except the services that are specifically exempted or covered by any another entry in the Negative List shall be liable to service tax. Amended section 66D(a) is as under:- “Services by Government or a Local Authority excluding the following services to the extent they are not covered elsewhere (iv) any service, other than those covered by clauses (i) to (iii) above, provided to business entities.” Hence ANY SERVICE by Government or a Local Authority except as exempt or in negative list shall be exigible to Service Tax. Consequential amendment to Reverse Charge provisions - In parity with the above proposed change in the negative list, the Union Budget, 2016 vide Notification No. 18/2016-ST dated March 1, 2016, has amended Reverse Charge Notification No. 30/2012-ST dated June 20, 2012 (“the Reverse Charge Notification”), to delete the words “by way of support services” appearing at Sl. No. 6 of the Table in the said notification with effect from April 1, 2016. Corresponding changes have also been made in Rule 2(1)(d)(i)(E) of the Service Tax Rules and Section 65B(49) ofthe Finance Act containing definition of the term ‘support services’ is also deleted. Hence all services by Government or a Local Authority except as exempt or in negative list, shall be under reverse charge mechanism and hence would effect all entities. Impact of the amendment on the negative list - Services which were provided by Government in terms of their sovereign right to business entities and which were not substitutable in any manner by any private entity, were not support services, e.g., grant of mining or licensing rights and, thus, were not taxable. But from the date the said amendment in the negative list is enforced whereby "any service" and not only "support services" are taxable suchservices, viz., grant of mining rights or licensing rights would also become taxable, unless same are covered elsewhere in the negative list or mega exemption notification. However, all payments to Government or Local Authority would not be taxable. In order to trigger taxability, a "service", i.e., activity for a consideration should be provided by the Government. The term 'service' as we know is defined in section 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994. For Eg. - Government has imposed a fine or penalty for violation of a provision of law. It would not be regarded as a service because to be a service, an activity has to be carried out for a consideration. Therefore, fines and penalties which are the legal consequences of people's actions are not in nature of consideration for an activity.
The definition of the term ‘service’ under Section 65B(44) of the Finance Act is wide enough to cover any activity carried out by a person for another for consideration, effective from April 1, 2016, all Governmental services would be exigible to Service tax. Further there are a series of notifications on issues of exemptions, points of taxation, etc on the subject. There is also a circular which clarifies various issues on the subject matter. An attempt has been made to compile the doubts and clarifications and in this article as follows -
In this regard, it is worthwhile mentioning here that under sub-clause (iv) only the services which are provided to business entities have been excluded from the negative list. Thus, when this amendment will come into effect the negative list would continue to operate in respect to the services other than those mentioned in sub-clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) which have been provided to non-business entities/persons.
Notification No. 22/2016-ST dated April 13, 2016, has amended the Mega Exemption Notification No 25/2012, to amend/insert the Entries in the following manner:
Taxes, cesses or duties levied are not consideration for any particular service as such and hence not leviable to Service Tax. These taxes, cesses or duties include excise duty, customs duty, Service Tax, State VAT, CST, income tax, wealth tax, stamp duty, taxes on professions, trades, callings or employment, octroi, entertainment tax, luxury tax and property tax.
Service Tax is payable on such installments in view of rule 7 of Point of Taxation Rules, 2011 as amended byvide Notification No. 24/2016-ST dated 13-4-2016. However, the same have been specifically exempted vide Notification No. 25/2012-ST dated 20-6-2012 as amended by Notification No. 22/2016-ST dated 13-4-2016 [Entry 61 refers]. The exemption shall apply only to Service Tax payable on one time charge, payable in full upfront or in installments, for assignment of right to use any natural resource and not to any periodic payment required to be made by the assignee, such as Spectrum User Charges, license fee in respect of spectrum, or monthly payments with respect to the coal extracted from the coal mine or royalty payable on extracted coal which shall be taxable.
In terms of Rule 6(2)(iv) of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 (“the Valuation Rules”), the value of any taxable service shall not include interest on delayed payment of any consideration for the provision of services or sale of property, whether moveable or immoveable. Now, the Central Government vide Notification No. 23/2016-ST dated April 13, 2016, has inserted following proviso to Rule 6(2)(iv) of the Service Tax Valuation Rules: “Provided that this clause shall not apply to any service provided by Government or a local authority to a business entity where payment for such service is allowed to be deferred on payment of interest or any other consideration.”
The Central Government vide Notification No. 24/2016-ST dated April 13, 2016, has amended Rule 7 of the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011 to provide that in case of services provided by the Government or local authority to any business entity, the POT shall be the earlier of the dates on which - Any payment, part or full, in respect of such service becomes due, as specified in the invoice, bill, challan or any other document issued by the Government or local authority demanding such payment; or Payment for such services is made.
The Credit Rules have been amended vide Notification No. 24/2016 CE (NT) dated April 13, 2016. Consequently, the Cenvat credit of the Service tax on one time charges (whether paid upfront or in installments) paid in a year, may be allowed to be taken evenly over a period of 3 (three) years. [Rule 4(7) of Credit Rules as amended]. However, the Service tax paid on spectrum user charges, license fee, transfer fee charged by the Government on trading of spectrum would be available in the year in which the same is paid. Likewise, Service tax paid on royalty in respect of natural resources and any periodic payments shall be available as credit in the year in which the same is paid. The existing eighth proviso in sub-rule (7) of Rule 4 of the Credit Rules is being omitted. Amendments have also been made in the Credit Rules, so as to allow Cenvat credit to be taken on the basis of the documents specified in sub-rule (1) of Rule 9 of the Credit Rules, even after the period of 1 year from the date of issue of such a document in case of services provided by the Government or a local authority or any other person by way of assignment of right to use any natural resource [Fifth Proviso to sub-rule (7) of Rule 4 of the Credit Rules]
It may be noted that still complete clarity/relief is not granted to Business Entities and some doubts still remain like
However, in the backdrop of this change, it is of utmost importance that Trade & Industry carry out a complete scrutiny of their records and cull out all the payments made to Government or Local Authorities. Thereafter it has to be checked whether these payments would be liable to reverse charge. This becomes all the more important for Government Companies and Government Authorities where major payments are made to Government and Local Authorities.
By: Vivek Jalan - May 14, 2016
Discussions to this article
Very good article. One question in mind- There are certain Toll Booths on roads where Toll is collected by State Road Development Corporation or National Highway Authority or on behalf of such Govt. authorities . In case of Toll paid by any Transporter, or any person (being Business Entity) to such Govt. authority is taxable under RCM?. Similarly if any worker or employee meets with an accident and is taken by the employer to any Govt. Hospital and employer pays for medical services provided by such Govt. Hospital, whether such payments are taxable under RCM? The readers/author may pl. express the views.
Sir Kindly clarify RCM on 1.Water and sewerage bills received from Municipal Corporation. 2. Property tax paid to Municipal Corporation.
Whether passport fees, import authorisation issue fees charged by DGFT, etc do the receivers of the so called service have to pay each time on RCM basis?
Mr. Subhash Modi: In my view, passport fees and Import authorisation, both are covered under mega exemption notification and not liable for the payment of service tax.
Mr. Satbir Sigh : Property Tax payment is not lieu of any service. It is tax and in my view, not liable for the payment of service tax.
Thanks Sir.
Dear Sir, What about the Brewery License Fee, Import and Export fee , Bottling fee , Factory license renewal fee paid to Sate Excise department or other govt. department for manufacturing of Alcohol . There is no service activity for consideration provided by the State Excise department. Shall Service receiver be liable to pay the Service tax on above fees paid to State Excise Department.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||