9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of the accrual of profits in the context of a company amalgamation for assessment year 1970-71. Analysis: The High Court of Bombay addressed a departmental reference concerning the assessment year 1970-71. The primary issue revolved around the accrual of profits from the business of Belapur Company Ltd. The Tribunal referred a question of law to the court, questioning the timing of the profit accrual for the entire period from October 1, 1968, to September 30, 1969. The amalgamation of Belapur Company Limited with Gangapur Sugar Mills Limited was a key factor in determining the profit allocation. The court noted that the order of amalgamation was not presented to the authorities, leading to reliance on the facts provided by the Tribunal. The court analyzed the previous years of the two companies involved in the amalgamation. Belapur Company had a previous year ending in September, while Gangapur Sugar Mills, post-amalgamation, had a previous year ending in June. The dispute arose regarding the inclusion of profits or losses from the Belapur unit in the assessee's total income. The Department argued that only profits or losses from June 1, 1969, onwards, when the ownership changed, should be assessed. However, the Tribunal, following the decision in CIT v. Ashokbhai Chimanbhai, held that profits or losses accrued on September 30, 1969, for the entire previous year of Belapur Company. The court considered the arguments presented by both parties. The Department contended that the ownership change required profit computation only from the date of acquisition onwards. In contrast, the assessee's counsel relied on the Supreme Court's decision regarding the accrual of profits in a continuing business. The court agreed with the Tribunal's interpretation, emphasizing that profits do not accrue day-to-day but must be ascertained at specific points. Due to the lack of closure of accounts on May 31, 1969, and the continuation of business until September 30, 1969, the court upheld the inclusion of Belapur Company's profits or losses in the assessee's total income for the relevant year. In conclusion, the court answered the question in favor of the assessee, affirming the Tribunal's decision. No costs were awarded in this judgment.
|
