Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2018 (12) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (12) TMI 653 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues: Failure to infuse funds into the company as per the approved resolution plan.

Analysis:
1. The Resolution Applicant failed to infuse the upfront payment of ?1,060 Crores into the company within 30 days from the approval of the Resolution Plan, leading to the Resolution Professional filing an application seeking direction against the Applicant for immediate implementation of the plan and depositing ?334 Crores as security for performance obligations.

2. The Resolution Applicant, along with other directors, was responsible for the implementation of the Resolution Plan, as highlighted in the application filed by the Resolution Professional.

3. A previous order was passed to constitute an interim Monitoring Committee to oversee the functions of the Corporate Debtor due to the lack of response from the Applicant regarding fund infusion.

4. Despite assurances made in the Resolution Plan, the Resolution Applicant did not fulfill the promise of bringing in the upfront payment within the stipulated time frame, causing concerns about the company's financial stability.

5. The Monitoring Committee discussed the need for the Resolution Applicant to deposit at least one third of the total payment to the Financial Creditors into an Escrow Account to safeguard the company's operations and financial commitments.

6. The Bench directed the Resolution Applicant to deposit ?334 Crores within five days as security for implementing the approved Resolution Plan, failing which further legal actions would be pursued by the Resolution Professional.

7. The Resolution Applicant's failure to adhere to the Resolution Plan's financial commitments posed a risk of the company collapsing, emphasizing the critical importance of timely fund infusion for the company's survival and avoiding liquidation.

8. The Resolution Applicant's delay in responding and seeking modifications instead of fulfilling the financial obligations outlined in the approved Resolution Plan raised concerns about the company's future viability and the need for immediate action to protect the interests of all stakeholders involved.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates