9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2022 (10) TMI 425 - AT - Central Excise100% EOU - Levy of SAD equivalent of VAT - transfer of goods which are chargeable to VAT to its own Domestic Tariff Area Unit - does the Central Excise Duty have to be paid including Special Additional Duty (SAD) of Customs or otherwise? - HELD THAT - The undisputed facts are that the appellant s goods were leviable to VAT and no VAT was paid because there was no sale of the goods but only stock transfer to its DTA unit. The point of taxation in respect of Central Excise duty and VAT are different. As far as the Central Excise duty is concerned, it becomes payable when the goods are cleared from the factory whether or not there is a sale because the taxable event is manufacture itself and not sale. On the other hand, the VAT is payable only when there is a sale or purchase. The taxable event is sale or purchase. Therefore, in cases such as this where the goods are transferred to the appellant s own units they are removed from the factory and, therefore, the Central Excise duty is payable. However, since there is no sale at that stage VAT is not payable. Subsequently, when the goods are sold by the DTA unit of the appellant VAT becomes payable. What is important for the Notification No. 23/2003 to be applicable is that VAT should not be exempted on those goods. Undisputedly, there was no exemption from VAT in this case. The mere fact that the payment of VAT does not happen concomitantly with the clearance of the goods does not mean that the VAT is exempted. The appellant is not liable to pay Central Excise duty reckoning the SAD payable on goods cleared by the appellant if they were imported into India - Appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant.
Issues Involved:
1. Applicability of Central Excise Duty including Special Additional Duty (SAD) for goods transferred by a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) to its Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) unit. 2. Interpretation of VAT exemption in the context of stock transfers within the same entity. Detailed Analysis: 1. Applicability of Central Excise Duty including SAD: The primary issue in these appeals is whether a 100% EOU transferring goods to its own DTA unit must pay Central Excise Duty, including SAD. According to the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, goods manufactured by a 100% EOU and cleared into DTA are subject to excise duty equivalent to the customs duty if such goods were imported into India. Goods imported into India are subject to Basic Customs Duty, Additional Duty of Customs, and SAD, among other duties. SAD is levied under Section 3(5) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 at a rate of 4% to level the playing field for domestic manufacturers who pay VAT. Notification No. 23/2003-CE dated 31.3.2003 specifies that SAD should not be included when calculating the aggregate duties of Customs for goods cleared by a 100% EOU into DTA, unless the goods are exempt from VAT or Sales Tax. The notification clearly states that if the goods are exempt from VAT, SAD must be included in the excise duty calculation. 2. Interpretation of VAT Exemption in Stock Transfers: The appellant argued that since no VAT was paid during the stock transfer of goods to its own DTA unit (due to the absence of a sale), it should not be construed as an exemption from VAT. The appellant cited several cases, including Micro Inks Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax [2014 (303) ELT 99 (Tri.-Ahmd.)], where it was held that non-payment of VAT during stock transfers does not equate to VAT exemption. The Tribunal noted that VAT is payable only upon the sale or purchase of goods, whereas Central Excise duty is payable upon the clearance of goods from the factory, regardless of sale. Therefore, in cases where goods are transferred to the appellant's own units, Central Excise duty is payable at the time of removal from the factory, but VAT is not due until the goods are sold by the DTA unit. The Tribunal emphasized that the crucial factor is whether the goods are exempt from VAT under any state notification. In this case, there was no such exemption. The Tribunal cited the Micro Inks case, which clarified that the absence of VAT payment during stock transfers does not imply an exemption granted by the state government. Conclusion: The Tribunal concluded that the appellant is not liable to pay Central Excise duty by including SAD for goods cleared to its DTA unit, as there was no VAT exemption applicable to these goods. Consequently, both appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside. Pronouncement: The judgment was pronounced in open court, allowing the appeals and setting aside the impugned orders.
|
