Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2022 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (10) TMI 534 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
Appeal against order upholding addition of Rs.6,31,641 under section 36(1)(va) for AY 2018-19.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Grounds of Appeal by Assessee:
- Assessee appealed against the order dated 01.08.2021 passed by the CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi for AY 2018-19.
- Grounds raised include challenge to the addition of Rs.6,31,641 made by AO under section 36(1)(va) as illegal and against natural justice.
- Assessee contended that the addition was confirmed by NFAC on the ground of belated payments, which was erroneous.
- Assessee argued that EPF and ESIC contributions were deposited within prescribed time limits under respective laws, hence not belated payments.

2. Assessee's Business and Assessment:
- Assessee is engaged in providing placement services and maintaining payroll for clients to reduce compliance burden.
- E-filed return of income on 29.08.2018 declaring total income as nil.
- AO made addition of Rs.6,31,641 for alleged belated payments of PF and ESIC.

3. Appeal and Dismissal by CIT(A):
- Assessee filed appeal before CIT(A) against assessment order.
- CIT(A) dismissed the appeal, leading to further appeal by the assessee.

4. Non-Appearance of Assessee:
- During the hearing, no one appeared on behalf of the assessee.
- Notice was served but returned as the assessee had left the premises without providing a new address.
- Proceedings based on submissions in CIT(A) order.

5. Legal Arguments and Precedents:
- Ld. DR cited decisions of Jurisdictional High Court and Delhi High Court to support the case against the assessee.
- Cited case law established that EPF and ESIC contributions beyond due date are not eligible for deduction under Section 43B of the Act.
- The issue contested by the assessee was held to be covered by adverse decisions of Jurisdictional High Court.

6. Decision and Dismissal of Appeal:
- The Tribunal heard the arguments and reviewed all relevant materials.
- Noted that the issue raised by the assessee was squarely covered by adverse decisions of the Jurisdictional High Court.
- Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed.

7. Final Order:
- The appeal of the assessee was dismissed, affirming the addition of Rs.6,31,641 under section 36(1)(va) for AY 2018-19.
- The order was pronounced in open court on 30th September 2022.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates