Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2023 (1) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (1) TMI 586 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues involved:
Interpretation of Section 4-BB of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 for granting set off on raw material used in manufacturing M.S. Ingot, applicability of judgments in similar cases, and whether natural gas qualifies as raw material.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Interpretation of Section 4-BB for Set Off
The revision arose from the Commercial Tax Tribunal's order dismissing the Second Appeal No. 109 of 2009 regarding the rejection of set off claimed by the assessee for raw material used in manufacturing M.S. Ingot for the year 2005-06. The dispute centered on whether the assessee was entitled to set off under Section 4-BB of the Act of 1948.

Issue 2: Applicability of Judgments
The revision was admitted based on questions of law regarding the applicability of judgments, including the Commercial Taxation Officer Vs. Rajasthan Taxchem Limited and Rathi Industries Vs. Commissioner Trade Tax cases. The revisionist argued that natural gas purchased from Gas Authority of India Limited qualified as raw material, citing relevant judgments.

Issue 3: Classification of Natural Gas as Raw Material
The revisionist contended that natural gas was a raw material used in manufacturing M.S. Ingot, thus eligible for set off under Section 4-BB. The Standing Counsel argued against this, stating that natural gas did not qualify as raw material under the Act of 1948. The court examined previous judgments and legislative intent to determine the classification of natural gas in the context of raw materials.

Court's Decision
After considering the arguments and precedents, the court held that natural gas used in the manufacturing process of M.S. Ingot qualified as a raw material under Section 4-BB. The court found that the Assessing Authority and Tribunal were unjustified in rejecting the claim without proper findings. Consequently, the court quashed the Tribunal's order and allowed the revision in favor of the assessee. The questions of law framed were answered in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the inclusion of natural gas as a raw material for set off purposes.

This detailed analysis highlights the court's interpretation of Section 4-BB, the relevance of previous judgments, and the classification of natural gas as a raw material in the context of granting set off under the Act of 1948.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates