Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2023 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (4) TMI 1004 - HC - Income Tax


Issues involved:
The judgment involves the refusal to hand over seized currency of Rs.47 lacs to the petitioner by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and the learned Judicial Magistrate, Khairwada, District Udaipur.

Details of the Judgment:

Issue 1: Seizure of Currency
The petitioner filed a criminal misc. petition against the order dated 31.07.2019, where the learned Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the revision petition and upheld the order dated 26.04.2019 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate. The seized currency of Rs.47 lacs was refused to be handed over to the petitioner. The petitioner argued that the currency was seized by the Police under Section 102 Cr.P.C. from an employee of the petitioner, who disclosed the source of the currency. The petitioner claimed that the courts erred in not releasing the currency to him.

Issue 2: Allegations and Suspicion
The petitioner contended that there were no allegations of theft or suspicion of any offense regarding the seized currency. Therefore, the courts were legally required to hand over the custody of the currency to the petitioner in the absence of such suspicions.

Issue 3: Consideration of Income Tax Department's Letter
The courts considered a letter from the Income Tax Department stating that the currency was unexplained and unaccounted cash, and a notice under Section 132-A of the Income Tax Act had been issued to the petitioner. The petitioner argued that any delinquency in tax filings could be addressed separately by the Income Tax Department, but it should not prevent the release of the seized currency to the rightful owner.

Issue 4: Legal Rights of the Petitioner
The petitioner asserted that the courts' approach to the case was erroneous and contrary to the law. The petitioner argued that the seized currency was not required for any trial or inquiry purposes and should have been released to him. The petitioner also offered to provide a bank guarantee for the release of the currency.

Issue 5: Opposition by Income Tax Department
The Public Prosecutor and counsel for the Income Tax Department opposed the release of the seized currency, citing an ongoing assessment proceeding and a warrant issued under the Income Tax Act. They argued against releasing the currency to the petitioner.

Conclusion:
The High Court allowed the misc. petition, quashing the orders of the lower courts. The seized currency of Rs.47 lacs was ordered to be released to the petitioner under certain conditions, including furnishing a bank guarantee of Rs.10 lacs in favor of the Income Tax Department. The release was subject to the completion of tax assessment proceedings by the Income Tax Department.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates