Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2023 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (6) TMI 603 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Addition of unexplained credit deposits under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act.
2. Addition of cash found during the search as unexplained income.
3. Treatment of commission income in cheque discounting business.
4. Telescoping benefit for unexplained cash found.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Addition of Unexplained Credit Deposits under Section 69:
The primary issue was the confirmation of additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, treating aggregate deposits in the assessee's bank accounts as unexplained credit deposits. The AO relied on the Delhi High Court's judgment in CIT v. D.K. Garg, emphasizing that the assessee failed to identify beneficiaries with complete details, thus justifying the additions. The assessee argued that he was engaged in the "cheque discounting" business and only earned commission income, which should be taxed instead of the entire deposits. The Tribunal observed that the AO acknowledged the cheque discounting business and noted that only the commission income should be subject to tax. The Tribunal referred to various judicial precedents supporting the view that only the real income/commission income from cheque discounting should be taxed, not the entire deposits. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that 0.25% of the total deposits should be considered as commission income for the assessment years under consideration.

2. Addition of Cash Found During the Search as Unexplained Income:
During the search, cash amounting to Rs. 28,30,100 was found, which the assessee could not explain. The AO added this amount as unexplained income, and the CIT(A) confirmed the addition but allowed the telescoping benefit, considering the cash found as an application of income. The Tribunal restored this issue to the CIT(A) for verification, ensuring that the telescoping benefit is given against the corresponding income offered for taxation in the relevant years.

3. Treatment of Commission Income in Cheque Discounting Business:
The Tribunal acknowledged that the assessee was engaged in the cheque discounting business, where he received cash in lieu of cheques and earned commission income. The assessee's contention was that only the commission income should be taxed, not the entire deposits. The Tribunal agreed, noting that the AO had recognized the cheque discounting business and the commission earned. The Tribunal directed that 0.25% of the total deposits in the bank accounts should be considered as commission income for the assessment years 2011-12 to 2017-18.

4. Telescoping Benefit for Unexplained Cash Found:
The CIT(A) allowed the telescoping benefit for the unexplained cash found during the search, considering it as an application of income. The Tribunal restored this issue to the CIT(A) for verification, ensuring that the telescoping benefit is appropriately given against the corresponding income offered for taxation in the relevant years.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2011-12 to 2016-17, directing that 0.25% of the total deposits in the bank accounts should be considered as commission income. For the assessment year 2017-18, the appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the issue of telescoping benefit being restored to the CIT(A) for verification. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of identifying beneficiaries and maintaining complete records to substantiate the commission income claimed by the assessee.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates