Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2023 (9) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (9) TMI 1125 - HC - GST


Issues involved:
The case involves the impugning of a penalty order passed under Section 129 of the Kerala Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with Rule 138 and the Rules made thereunder, due to the transportation of goods without the required statutory documents, leading to suspicion of tax evasion.

Details of the Judgment:

Issue 1: Transportation of Goods without Statutory Documents
The 2nd respondent intercepted a vehicle carrying spare parts and engine oil without the prescribed documents under the GST Act. The driver admitted to not having valid documents, triggering a Show Cause Notice for suspected tax evasion.

Issue 2: Response to Notice
The owner of the goods, M/s. EVM Passenger Cars India Pvt. Ltd., responded, explaining that the goods were transported from their Bangalore office with relevant documents but were not kept by the local transporter. They provided details of invoices and requested the release of the consignment.

Issue 3: Adjudication Proceedings
A writ petition directed the adjudication authority to complete the process within seven days. The authority inspected the goods again, emphasizing the necessity of valid documents for transportation. The lack of documents was deemed a willful act of tax evasion.

Issue 4: Discrepancy in E-way Bills
Although the dealer provided e-way bills later, discrepancies were found between the mentioned vehicle and the actual one used for transportation. The authority concluded that the dealer failed to explain the inconsistency convincingly.

Issue 5: Adjudication Outcome
The adjudicating authority held that transporting goods without statutory documents constitutes willful tax evasion. The dealer's attempt to justify the lack of documents post-notice was rejected, leading to the imposition of tax and penalty as per the impugned order.

Conclusion:
Considering the provisions of the GST Act and the facts of the case, the court upheld the impugned order imposing tax and penalty, stating that it does not warrant interference. As a result, the writ petition was dismissed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates