Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2024 (3) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (3) TMI 786 - HC - GST


Issues involved:
The issues involved in this case include challenging the Impugned Order dated 17.3.2023 under Section 83 of the CGST Act, 2017, and seeking relief through a writ of certiorari or mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Petitioner also sought permission to utilize funds for making a pre-deposit required for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017.

Judgment Details:

1. The Petitioner filed a Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the Impugned Order provisionally attaching the Petitioner's Bank Account under Section 83 of the CGST Act, 2017. The Petitioner sought the quashing of the Impugned Order and the lifting of the provisional attachment.

2. The Petitioner had previously filed a Writ Petition, and after the show cause notice was adjudicated, the Petitioner filed an Appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017, requiring a pre-deposit of 10% of the disputed tax amount. The Petitioner sought permission to withdraw funds from the bank account to make this pre-deposit for the Appeal.

3. The Court acknowledged the necessity for the Petitioner to utilize the funds for the pre-deposit, emphasizing that the amount would be deposited with the Government for the purpose of maintaining the Appeal and not for any private use. The Court noted that similar permissions had been granted in other cases.

4. In light of the above, the Court disposed of the Petition by allowing the Petitioner to operate Bank Account No. 713915009 to withdraw the required amount for the pre-deposit. The Petitioner was also permitted to use electronic transfer for making the deposit, and the provisional attachment of the bank account was lifted solely for this purpose.

5. The concerned Bank was directed to enable the Petitioner to make the deposit before a specified date. The Court clarified that all contentions of the parties on the merits of the Appeal were to be kept open for further proceedings.

6. The Petition was disposed of with no costs imposed on either party. The parties were instructed to act as per the authenticated copy of the Court's order for compliance with the directives provided.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates