Retrospective application of Sec. 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - Central Excise - 655/46/2002

Circular No. 655/46/2002-CX, Dt. 26/08/2002 Retrospective application of Sec. 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 Sir, Sub: Retrospective application of Sec. 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 I am directed to say that doubts have been raised as to whether provisions of Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, will apply to past clearances or not. 2. The Board had clarified vide F.No. 354/118/96-TRU dt. 6.1.97 (Para 3) that it would apply even to past cases where duty u/s 11A(2) is determined on or after 28.9.96. 3. Further, on the matter being referred to the Solicitor General of India (SG), in his detailed opinion dt. 3.1.2000, he had opined that sec. 11AB would apply to all adjudications orders passed on or after 28.9.96 irrespective of the fact whether it relates to clearances made before 28.9.96 or after. A copy of the SG's opinion was sent to all Chief Commissioners vide Board's letter F.No. 387/90/98-JC dt. 27.3.2001. 4. However, in CEGAT Order No. 1375/97 dt. 22.4.97 in the case of M/s. M.P. Tapes Vs. CCE, Coimbatore, it has, inter alia, been held that provisions of sec. 11AB, inserted w.e.f. 28.9.96, are in the nature of penal interest and would apply only to those cases where clearances were affected after 28.9.96. The Reference Application filed by the Commissioner before the CEGAT was dismissed by the CEGAT on 28.5.1998 [reported in 1998 (103) ELT 128 (TRIB)]. The Reference Application before the Madras High Court (RCP No.1/99) was dismissed on 12.5.2000. The Deptt.'s SLP (CC 7698/2000) against the High Court order was dismissed by the Apex Court on 27.11.2000. 5. The matter has been examined in the Board. It is seen that Section 11AB(2), when it was introduced on 28.9.96, inter alia stated that the provisions of sec. 11AB(1) - i.e. for charging interest -- would not apply to cases where duty become payable before the Finance Bill, 1996, received the assent of the President (which was on 28.9.96). A view was taken by the Department in its Circular dt. 6.1.97 and by the SG in his opinion dt. 3.1.2000, that duty becomes `payable' only after adjudication and therefore sec. 11AB (2) would apply to all cases where adjudications are done on and from 28.9.96, irrespective of the fact whether it relates to clearances of an earlier period. The Apex Court has, however, confirmed a contrary view in the case of M/s. M.P. Tapes. 6. Section 11AB(2) [as well as section 11AB(1)] has been substituted w.e.f. 11.5.2001 by the Finance Act, 2001, making it now very clear that Section 11AB will apply only to cases where duty had become payable or ought to have been paid after 11.5.2001. Further, proviso to section 11AB(1), as inserted w.e.f. 11.5.2001, makes it quite clear that duty becomes `payable' on the basis of instructions or directions of the Board also and not necessarily because of adjudication of a case. 7. Thus, the net effect of the judgement in the case of M.P. Tapes and the amendment made to section 11AB w.e.f. 11.5.2001 is that the said section can be invoked only in respect of clearances affected after 28.9.96, irrespective of the date of passing of the adjudication order. 8. Trade notices may be issued for the information of the Trade. 9. Hindi version will follow. 10. Receipt of these instructions may kindly be acknowledged. Issued by: Government of India Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise Customs, New Delhi F.No. 4/01/2002-CX.1