Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Service Tax This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Information asked by Service tax survey Section., Service Tax

Issue Id: - 106169
Dated: 14-10-2013
By:- vinay wakde

Information asked by Service tax survey Section.


  • Contents

Recently we have received a letter from the Superintendent (Servey), service Tax Department for  submitting the  payment details of all the Services providers for FY 2012-13. We have submitted the list of service providers, their address & Service tax Registration number and also requested to visit the factory for verification. However, the Superintendent (Survey), Service Tax  is insisting us to submit payment details (service provider wise) for the FY 2012-13 on CD.   Kindly advise us in the matter.  Is there any legal  provisions  to collect such data from Service Tax recipient.

Regards,

VINAY

 

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 15 of 15 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 16-10-2013
By:- Pradeep Khatri

Yes, the revenue department has all powers to ask/demand/collect informtion/documents.  If you deny, then, they may issue summons on you.


2 Dated: 17-10-2013
By:- Brijesh Verma

In my opinion, your duty gets exhausted immediately when you have furnished accurate names, addresses and contact numbers along with STC No. of your vendors.

You may softly make a request that under rule 9(6) of the  Cenvat Credit Rule, 2004:  all an assessee is required to do is 

"(6) The manufacturer of final products or the provider of output service shall maintain proper records for the receipt and consumption of the input services in which the relevant information regarding the value, tax paid, CENVAT credit taken and utilized, the person from whom the input service has been procured is recorded and the burden of proof regarding the admissibility of the CENVAT credit shall lie upon the manufacturer or provider of output service taking such credit."

Therefore such a burden regarding admissibility will only arise when the department raises a doubt regarding non-admissibility...

 Please take a strong stand and do not submit to any sort of harassment 


3 Dated: 21-10-2013
By:- MANDAVILLI RAMAKRISHNA

take a acknowledgement and issue in CD form if you can otherwise inform them that you are not able to give in CD form and submit the copies of the data previously submitted.

however, it is better to extend cooperation to the department at zero cost to your entity.

 


4 Dated: 22-10-2013
By:- Rajesh Sharma

I dont agree with the opinion given by Mr. B. Verma, It seems that the department wants to know from your data that whether the service providers have discharged their ST liability. Therefore, you must cooperate with them. And should not adopt the tactics advised by Mr. Verma.


5 Dated: 22-10-2013
By:- Brijesh Verma

Its just an opinion and not any negative tactics. You have already extended co-operation. We never support a view that we must act anti-department but any demand which is not within the four corners of law can not be entertained.


6 Dated: 22-10-2013
By:- MANDAVILLI RAMAKRISHNA

I do not agree to the comments of Mr. Rajesh.

According to the law, an assessee is required to submit data when his tax credit is examined or when his data is required to examine the correctness of third party's tax credit. Tax laws require persons to pay taxes on their activity but can not harass any person for their comfort. We can not run a company for responding unnecessarily every day for every silly question/ query. When we discharged our tax liability our obligation is fulfilled. That is enough and more than that Law can not insist any person.

More over, using the words like ' tactics ' is not correct. 

No body in this forum participates to give tactics as the recipients are not known and no advantage is gained by any expert.

Kindly withdraw your comment so that experts like Mr. Brijesh Varma can participate and educate and guide the members regularly even they are very busy.


7 Dated: 25-10-2013
By:- Ashok Jogalekar

It is better to co-operate and provide the information called for as per your convenience if it is easily available in order to avoid further problems. Otherwise be ready to face the wrath which is avoidable I feel.


8 Dated: 25-10-2013
By:- Brijesh Verma

Ashok sir,

even we are of the same view, but the problem which the Ld. queriest is facing is far aggravated than a mere request from department. The department wants him to prove the tax payments of all his input service providers of whom he took credit and further wants him to provide the whole info on CD


9 Dated: 26-10-2013
By:- Ashok Jogalekar

This is ridiculous, it is not the responsibility of the receiver of the service to prove as to whether the service provider has remitted the service tax. In this connection refer recent Honorable Supreme Court judgement in the case of KAY KAY Industries (2013 (8) TMI 772 - SUPREME COURT) = 2013 (295) ELT 177 (SC). The law only expects to take reasonable care and it need not required to verify the payment by the assessee.


10 Dated: 26-10-2013
By:- Brijesh Verma

Thanks Ashok sahab for upholding our views and providing such a vital judgment !!!


11 Dated: 26-10-2013
By:- MANDAVILLI RAMAKRISHNA

thank you Mr. Ashok


12 Dated: 28-10-2013
By:- Anoop Bhatia

Yes, the revenue department has all powers to ask/demand/ collect information/documents.  If you dny, then they may issue summons on you.


13 Dated: 19-11-2013
By:- raj kumar shukla

with reference toSri  B.verma post dtd 25/10/13, I would like to add that dept wants payment details and not service tax payment details. See the query.


14 Dated: 19-11-2013
By:- Ashok Jogalekar

May be they want the payment details for the service received, since, if the payment is not made for the services in 3 months max for the services then you have to reverse the credit availed, however, you can avail credit again once payment is made.

Please discuss the actual requirement of the department as may be they intend to check this aspect.

 


15 Dated: 20-11-2013
By:- Prakash Deval

As per my knowledge the section under which Suptd was empowered to scrutinize returns i.e. section 71 was withdrawn for obvious reasons in year 2004. Thereafter if Superintendent is required to investigate he has to be authorized by officer not below Deputy Commissioner with reasons recorded in writing. However not withstanding the provision which only means to prevent the exploitation of taxpayers, there is no doubt that Government can look in to any transaction to check revenue loss or tax evasion. However giving data on CD i.e. soft copy can be tampered with. Therefore while writing CD make it tamper proof. Secondly provide a hard copy i.e. print out of the data given in CD and put a rider that soft copy is provided only for convenience and data in print out form is to be considered as authentic.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates