Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Central Excise This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Intrest not payable when not utilized notification no, Central Excise

Issue Id: - 106228
Dated: 9-11-2013
By:- Deepak Bhardwaj

Intrest not payable when not utilized notification no


  • Contents

Please provide the notification no which was state that interest not payable when not utilized .

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 3 of 3 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 9-11-2013
By:- PAWAN KUMAR

Central Excise Non-Tariff Notification No.18/2012-C.E.(N.T.) Dated 17.03.2012 amending the definition of rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rule, 2004 2004, w.e.f. 17.03.2012.


2 Dated: 17-11-2013
By:- Rakesh Chitkara
If period involved is prior to 1.4.12 : Matter is in controversy for the period prior to this amendment , nullifying Supreme Court decision in Ind-Swift case (favouring Revenue). Luckily that decision is now not valid as the Cenvat Credit Rule 14 has been amended (rare thing that some thing is done in favour of assessee and the word 'or' has been replaced by 'and'. Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, as amended w.e.f. 1-4-2012 uses words ‘availed and utilised’.  Hence, if Cenvat credit was wrongly taken but not utilised for payment of excise duty or service tax, interest is not payable.

There have been some other decisions of Tribunals lately which have sought to distinguish Ind-Swift. For instance, 2013 (7) TMI 567 - CESTAT NEW DELHI [Commissioner of Central Excise, Allahabad Versus M/s. Balrampur Chini Mills Ltd. and M/s. Jaypee Cement Blending Unit] and 

Contest the case if for prior period, if the amount of demand is substantial. Some case-laws (mostly against you) can be referred to understand the issue in detail

ANNAVARMA CONCRETE

EMCO LTD. 

HINDUSTAN INSECTICIDES LTD

Gujarat State Fertilisers & Chem.

GENUS ELECTROTECH LTD

K.L. CONCAST (P) LTD.

DENSO KIRLOSKAR

LAKSHMI MACHINE WORKS


3 Dated: 18-11-2013
By:- Rakesh Chitkara

Another decision has been reported in TMI in favour of assessee today on the issue. Case of Bill Forge (Karnataka High Court) =   [2011 (4) TMI 969 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] has been relied upon, while distinguishing Supreme Court order in Ind-Swift case (2011 (2) TMI 6 - Supreme Court). 

M/s. Gary Pharmaceuticals (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Ludhiana.  = (2013 (11) TMI 780 - CESTAT NEW DELHI)


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates