Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum VAT + CST This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Works Contract rate charged wrongly (West Bengal VAT), VAT + CST

Issue Id: - 112283
Dated: 5-7-2017
By:- Prasun Bhuit

Works Contract rate charged wrongly (West Bengal VAT)


  • Contents

We charged a vat of 5% on a product. Last year the Department assessed that 13.5% should have been charged and claimed the excess tax. We appealed and submitted before the concerned authority with documents and other proofs, that the material tax slab should be 5%. Finally the Jt Commissioner, satisfied with all evidences, ordered that the vat should be 5% as charged by us and not 13.5% as claimed by the Department.

This year, again the department do the same thing.

My question is, while one verdict was given for an appeal before by the same department, can they again pass the same erroneous order.

Every time, we should not be expected to appear before the same authority for the same reason, because this costs us money and time and distupting our business activity.

And finally I want to ask my learned expert team, what should I do now. Is there any provision to go directly to any court.

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 1 of 1 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 5-7-2017
By:- KASTURI SETHI

The Department has right to file appeal against order of Joint Commissioner because the department feels aggrieved with the decision of Joint Commissioner thinking that it is incorrect and and unlawful. The Department will continue issuing recurring show cause notice until justice is done to the department. If the Department goes to Supreme Court, SCNs will be issued till the final decision.

The department is legally correct.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates