Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Income Tax This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Indexation on cost of acquisition, Income Tax

Issue Id: - 1769
Dated: 12-2-2010
By:- Rahul Gupta

Indexation on cost of acquisition


  • Contents

X booked a flat in year 1995 and paid the advance of Rs. 20,00,000/-. Registary deed made on 2001 of Rs. 40,45,000/-. property sold out in 2006. While calulating Capital Gain, Indexation on cost of acquisition should be done from 1995 or 2001?

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 4 of 4 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 13-2-2010
By:- Surender Gupta
when you book the flat and paid Rs. 20,00,000 you got the right to acquire the flat in 1995. But the year in which the flat was transferred to you, you got the right converted into immovable asset. Considering that you got the possession in 2001 and got the flat registered in 2001, your ownership starts from 2001 only. Therefore, you must calculate your capital gain by taking the cost of Indexation for 2001 and 2006 only.

2 Dated: 13-2-2010
By:- DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Date of booking 1995- not relevant. Date of possession ?? Date of registry 2001- amt. 40.45 lakh- whether it is full consideration or stamp authorituies valuation. 1995 or 2001 both may not be relevant. Cost and its CII will relate back to the date of possession, even if some amount was due, to be paid on registry, liability has accrued and credit facility is availed on day of possession . So consider actual cost, date of possession and relevant CII. Always full facts must be given withe own views.

3 Dated: 13-2-2010
By:- Rahul Gupta
IN MY CASE ASSESSEE SIGNED BUYER'S AGREEMENT IN 1995 and got the possession in 2001. Also please refer to case Mrs. Shakuntala Devi VS DDIT-bangalore-TIOL-221-ITAT. INCOME TAX CASE-SEC 54-ASSESSEE SELLS HER FLAT -MAKES CAPITAL GAINS-SIGNS AN MOUWITH A SELLER OF A PROPERTY AND TRANSFERS SUNSTANTIAL PART OF TOTAL CONSIDERATION-CLAIMS EXEMPTION U/S 54-AO DISALLOWS EXEMPTION ON THE GROUND THAT THE ASSESSEE HAD NOT GOT OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE TIME-LIMIT OF 2 YEARS -ASSESSEE ARGUES THAT THE CAPITAL GAIN MADE HAD BEEN TRANSFERRED TO THE SELLER OF THE PROPERTY BEING PURCHASED AS PER MOU AND WAS ELIGIBLE FOR EXEMPTION- HELD, TRANSFER OF PROPERTY,POSESSION OR OWNERSHIP HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CASE AS LONG AS THE SUM OF CAPITAL GAINS STAND TRANSFERRED TO THE SELLER FOR PURCHASE OF A NEW FLAT AS THIS FULFILLS THE CONDITION OF SEC. 54-ASSESSEE'S APPEAL ALLOWED: BANGALORE ITAT Please Advice and Thanks for your lot of Concern. Regards

4 Dated: 16-2-2010
By:- ASHOK CHOUDHARY
Capital Gain will be calculate from year 2001. As small right ( booking ) to acquire a flat merged into larger right (as registration of the flat in the year 2001). The small right ( booking flat ) upon a merger would loose its existance. In simple reply registration of flat is bigger than booking of flat so capital gain will be calulate from the date of registration

Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates