TMI Blog2008 (12) TMI 379X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ot made out for interference. Petition dismissed. - 13984 of 2008 - - - Dated:- 3-12-2008 - R.M. Doshit and K.M. Thaker, JJ. Shri Paresh M. Dave, for the Petitioner. Shri Harin P. Raval, ASGI, for the Respondent. [Order per : R.M. Doshit, J. (Oral)]. - The petitioner, a sick industrial undertaking, has challenged the Order dated 8 August, 2008 [2009 (238) E.L.T. 112 (Tri. - Ah ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... not have been asked to deposit any amount as a condition precedent for entertaining the appeals preferred by the petitioner. 3. We do agree that the fact that the petitioner is a sick industrial company is a relevant factor for consideration. However, if the Tribunal has ordered deposit of mere 25% of the custom duty involved and 10% of the penalty imposed, no case for interference is made out. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|