TMI Blog1994 (3) TMI 226X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Shri Vipin Nair, ld. advocate on a query from the Bench fairly concedes that even the revised EA-3 form is not according to the prescribed form inasmuch as Column 8(A) is missing. He also concedes that the certified copy of the order-in-original as required in terms of CEGAT (Procedure) Rules has also not been filed. He also concedes the further position that the seal of the company on the vario ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the cost of the time of Registry and Govt. Revenue, that is to say, order for issuing of notice for hearing on 31-1-1994. That is how the learned counsel appeared today submitting that he received the telephonic message from Shri Subhash Goel, Managing Director, intimating him that he had to go back because of an accident and was therefore, unable to reach Delhi. However, on a query from the Benc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for adjournment. On 5-10-1993, the learned counsel Shri Rajiv Dutta never appeared and again his proxy, Vipin Nair appeared and requested for ad journment with an undertaking to file the Vakalatnama. 3. We are not happy with such casual approach and thought it proper to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. However, in the interests of justice and as a last chance we give two weeks to the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|