1994 (3) TMI 226

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Respondents. [Order per: P.C. Jain, Member (T)]. - Shri Vipin Nair, ld. advocate on a query from the Bench fairly concedes that even the revised EA-3 form is not according to the prescribed form inasmuch as Column 8(A) is missing. He also concedes that the certified copy of the order-in-original as required in terms of CEGAT (Procedure) Rules has also not been filed. He also concedes the furth .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ying the defects adjourned the hearing for today at the cost of the time of Registry and Govt. Revenue, that is to say, order for issuing of notice for hearing on 31-1-1994. That is how the learned counsel appeared today submitting that he received the telephonic message from Shri Subhash' Goel, Managing Director, intimating him that he had to go back because of an accident and was therefore, unab .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as proxy counsel of Shri Rajiv Dutta and requested for adjournment. On 5-10-1993, the learned counsel Shri Rajiv Dutta never appeared and again his proxy, Vipin Nair appeared and requested for ad journment with an undertaking to file the Vakalatnama. 3. We are not happy with such casual approach and thought it proper to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. However, in the interests of jus .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X