1995 (5) TMI 136

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... arad Bhansali, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. - This application for condonation is dated 19-09-1985. Due to patent laches of the Registry, this application has come up in 1995. This application should have been disposed of in the year 1995 itself. Be that as it may, the application is required to be heard and disposed of before the Appeal is heard. The applican .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and also the O.P.D. No. The Counsel submitted that if he was called to explain this discrepancy after 10 years, it would be very much difficult for him to do so. However, he was ready and willing to get the explanation from the party. 2. We have heard both the sides. Notwithstanding the objection raised by Ld. D.R., we think that there are no laches or patent negligence on the part of the ap .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X