2002 (10) TMI 278

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... espondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. In the order impugned in this appeal, the Commissioner has held that the appellant did not contravene the condition contained in the third clause of the proviso to Notification 245/83 and was therefore entitled to its benefit. The notification grants partial exemption to patent or proprietary medicaments. The proviso required that the m .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the one on whose behalf the respondent undertook the job. The respondent would not have been required to file a price list for these goods. Its failure to include the goods in the price list that it filed would hence not lead to contravention of the third clause of the proviso. This is the reasoning on which the Commissioner (Appeals) has passed the order. We find no ground for interference. 3. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X