TMI Blog2003 (10) TMI 323X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... der per : Moheb Ali M., Member (T)]. - The stay application arises out of the order of the Commissioner of Customs (Import), dated 10-3-2003 wherein he ordered that a sum of Rs. 11,77,233/- be appropriated from the duty deposited by the applicant at the time of provisional release of the goods in dispute. He also ordered that redemption fine of Rs. 1,88,000/- and a penalty of Rs. 47,446/- be rec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pleaded that since the full recovery of duty amount has already been made, recovery of fine and penalty would constitute undue hardship, since they have a prima facie case in their favour. 2. Briefly, the issue pertains to import of stainless steel coils/sheets cleared from Chennai port under DEEC scheme with an actual user condition. The allegation is that the importers have diverted the i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s for some time, we notice that the applicants' plea that they may be allowed to furnish a fresh bank guarantee covering the fine and penalty can be accepted till the appeal is decided, in lieu of deposit. 5. Accordingly, we order that upon furnishing a fresh bank guarantee by the applicants for the fine and penalty involved, the stay against the operation of the impugned order is granted. T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|